Smallwood, Reynolds, Stewart & Stewart. Jefferson-Pilot Building (1990). Greensboro, North Carolina.123
References
Schlosser, Jim. “Building designers to draw from past”. Greensboro News & Record (Greensboro, North Carolina), February 26, 1988, p. A12. ↩︎
Schlosser, Jim. “Jefferson-Pilot building provides another trade-off”. Greensboro News & Record (Greensboro, North Carolina), July 3, 1988, p. D1. ↩︎
Hopper, Kathryn. “New Jefferson-Pilot building officially a part of downtown”. Greensboro News & Record (Greensboro, North Carolina), July 22, 1990, p. D1. ↩︎
Bruce & Morgan. Kiser Law Building (1891-1936). Atlanta.1
The Background
The following article, published in The Atlanta Constitution in 1890, includes an illustration and a brief description of the Kiser Law Building, completed in 1891 and designed by Bruce & Morgan.
Located at the northwest corner of Hunter and Pryor Streets (later Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive SE and Pryor Street SE) in Atlanta, the five-story office building was owned byM.C. Kiser, a local real estate developer.
Location of Kiser Law Building
Members of the Atlanta Bar Association had reportedly approached Kiser for several years with requests for him to build a structure designed exclusively for law offices.23
When Kiser finally agreed to the project, the association formed a building committee that considered two designs for the structure: one by A.Mc.C. Nixon, and the winning plan by Bruce & Morgan.45
Bruce’s Approach
Although T.H. Morgan increasingly became the primary designer for Bruce & Morgan through the 1890s, A.C. Bruce still handled the majority of the firm’s output in the early part of the decade, and the Kiser Law Building appears to have been his design.
Bruce was a former cabinet maker and carpenter who lacked formal architectural training, and by 1890, the limits of his skill set were becoming readily apparent.
Many of Bruce’s designs from the early 1890s appear heavy-handed and anachronistic: you can see he was attempting to adapt to modern tastes, but his design sensibility was still fundamentally stuck in the 1870s — the Kiser Law Building was a prime example.
Looking at the illustration above, the building resembles a stack of drawers haphazardly piled on top of each other, and oversized windows of varying shapes and sizes junk up both facades.
That additive approach to design was typical of architects with a background in carpentry, who often designed buildings as if they were giant pieces of furniture, joining disparate elements and tacking on unnecessary embellishments instead of envisioning their compositions as solid masses to be sculpted into form.
The building’s overall style is equally baffling: Bruce was presumably aiming for the Romanesque, but for all the eclectic adornments, including terra cotta trim,67a decorative slate roof with iron crestings, ornamental iron balconies, and marble columns,8 he didn’t quite achieve a cohesive style. The pyramidal peaks and elaborate gables were also becoming rapidly outdated by 1891.
Kiser Law Building circa 1936
Design and Construction
As construction began, it was reported that the Kiser Law Building would be constructed of either Berea sandstone or marble.9 It’s Atlanta, so it appears they opted for the cheaper sandstone for most of the structure and incorporated marble trim around the entrance.10
Set over a full basement, the building’s five floors included a 16-foot-wide central hall, served by one elevator, four stairwells, and two fire escapes. A light court was also designed to extend from the top to the bottom floor, so that each of the building’s 84 offices would be lighted and ventilated from the outside.11
The building was illuminated with electric lighting and included “water closets of the latest patterns…located in the rear [heh] of every floor.12
While it was originally reported that the building would be heated by steam,1314 Kiser ultimately chose the Bolton Hot Water System, which was marketed as a “purely scientific, healthful way of heating.”15
I don’t really care enough about such things to learn more; however, the man who supervised the heating system’s installation told the Constitution: “…the larger buildings in the north have been heated by hot water apparatuses for the last ten or twelve years, yet it is practically new for the south…”16
No surprise, really: Atlanta’s self-conscious developers are always late to the game, simply replicating what was done a decade ago in the better cities of the North.
The floors of the Kiser Law Building were planned as follows:
The ground floor included spaces for four stores — the storefront at the corner of Hunter and Pryor was designated for a bank,17 and another space facing Pryor Street was planned as a restaurant.18 The entrance hallway featured marble wainscoting and tile19 and led to “four broad stairways” and “an elevator of the most approved pattern.”20
The second, third, and fourth floors were identical in design, and each contained 28 office suites — 14 on each side of the central hall. The offices were finished in hardwoods and Georgia pine, with fireproof vaults and closets.2122
The fifth floor was intended to housetwo large halls “suited to the use of secret societies, public meetings and other similar purposes,”23 as well as a kitchen, storerooms, reception room, and a club room or library.24
Construction on the building began on April 8, 1890,25 with J.H. Matthews,26 “a wide-awake contractor”,27 supervising the project. The initial estimated cost of the building was $90,000, with a projected completion date of April 1, 1891.28 The cost rose to $100,000 by 1891,29 and the building was completed in August 1891.3031
Local interest in the project was high, and while construction was still underway in November 1890, Kiser had reportedly received applications from 100 lawyers seeking office space.32
Firms began announcing their intention to move to the building in early 1891,33 and in June 1891, George W. Adair, who handled leasing for the property, reported: “The Kiser law building is nearly ready for occupancy, which is good news to those who have already selected their rooms, and others that are waiting for its completion.”34
Their lease agreements should have included the following caveat: the only thing slimier than a lawyer is an Atlanta developer.
The Terminal Debacle
In July 1891, Kiser leased nearly the entire law building — including the top four floors, the corner store on the ground floor, and the full basement3536 — to a single firm: the Richmond Terminal Company, which had abruptly decided to relocate its headquarters from Washington, D.C. to Atlanta.37
The company stated its intention to use the Kiser Building as temporary office space until it could build its own facility in the city,38 signing a two-year lease for the then-unheard-of sum (in Atlanta anyway) of $14,500 a year.3940
Commonly referred to as the “Terminal”, the company had previously purchased the Central Railroad and Banking Company, Georgia’s oldest railroad,41 based in Savannah. The Terminal’s new Atlanta headquarters consolidated the employees from both Savannah and Washington in a single location.
However, the Kiser Building was much too small to house the Terminal’s 250 to 300 workers,4243 and one executive stated, “Unfortunately that building is not large enough to fully accommodate all the offices, but we will try to make do.” Kiser said of the negotiation: “…the trouble was they wanted more room, but finally concluded they could get along by adding the corner room and the basement.”44
The Terminal’s hasty relocation to Atlanta was more than a little suspicious, and there were allegations that it wasn’t “bona fide”, which the company denied.45 Atlanta’s newspapers, of course, hailed the move, with the always-bloviating Constitution prognosticating:
“A grand new depot and office building. That is the inevitable result.
The bringing of these offices to Atlanta is a bigger thing than might appear at first glance. This naturally makes Atlanta the center of the railroad situation of the south, and, as Atlanta is now the insurance center, it becomes beyond question the financial center of the south.”46
The lawyers who already selected offices in the Kiser Building just had to suck it, I guess. The Odd Fellows probably weren’t too thrilled either: the Constitution reported in July 1891 that “about ten days ago they selected the fifth floor of the Kiser building and immediately rented it as an Odd Fellows’ hall. Then the Terminal people came along and wished the place.”47
Anyone who knows how shit goes down in Atlanta could guess what happened next: Just six months after the Terminal employees began working in the Kiser building, the Central Railroad was forced into receivership by a local judge.4849
Rumors of the Terminal’s financial difficulties and potential bankruptcy had swirled around Atlanta for months, spurred by the resignations of top executives and directors who had reportedly been battling for control of the company.5051
There was also the time in January 1892, when the company apparently lacked the funds to pay its employees, delaying their paychecks for more than a week,52535455 a situation charitably described as “embarrassing.”56
The final blow was delivered in a lawsuit filed by a stockholder against the company, alleging that, among other things, the Terminal’s owners were conspiring to transfer $500,000,000 in debt onto the Central Railroad, “which it [could] never pay,”5758 presumably with the intent to bankrupt it. Sounds like business as usual for an American enterprise.
Under the rules of the receivership, the Central Railroad’s 74 employees59 returned to Savannah,6061 and while it initially appeared that the remaining Terminal employees would stay in Atlanta, they were ordered back to Washington in June 1892, leaving the Kiser Building nearly vacant.6263The company hired George W. Adair to sublet the building,64 which was filled with lawyers as originally planned.65
The Inevitable Demise
Office structures tend to fall out of fashion quickly, and in 1930, the Journal said of the Kiser Law Building: “…the lawyers, loan brokers, and trade representatives [have] shifted to more modernly equipped buildings…”, noting that, “storms of nearly half a century have raised havoc with the structure and its artistic domes, its oriel windows, and its ornamental trimmings.”66
By 1936, the Kiser Law Building was reportedly “almost empty except for a store or two on the sidewalk.”67 No one seemed too upset when the structure was demolished in November and December 1936 for — take a wild guess — a parking lot.686970
The Article
Major M.C. Kiser’s “Law Building” will be one of the handsomest buildings in the south, and when finished will be one of Atlanta’s greatest attractions.
The Constitution gives here an excellent cut of the building, made from the drawings of Bruce & Morgan, the architects. The uses to which the building are to be put have been fully explained in these columns.
The building will be erected at the corner of Pryor and Hunter streets, fronting on Pryor, and will be five stories in height. It will be devoted to offices for lawyers, with clubrooms for a Lawyers’ club. It will be just as complete as possible, an ideal building in every respect.71
References
Illustration credit: Atlanta in 1890: “The Gate City”. Atlanta: The Atlanta Historical Society, Inc. (1986), p. 62. ↩︎
“The Kiser Building”. The Atlanta Constitution, January 26, 1890, p. 19. ↩︎
“Kiser’s Law Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 8, 1890, p. 7. ↩︎
“The Kiser Building”. The Atlanta Constitution, January 26, 1890, p. 19. ↩︎
“Kiser’s Law Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 8, 1890, p. 7. ↩︎
“The Kiser Building”. The Atlanta Constitution, January 26, 1890, p. 19. ↩︎
“History In Clay.” The Atlanta Constitution, May 15, 1892, p. 3. ↩︎
“Kiser’s Law Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 8, 1890, p. 7. ↩︎
“Kiser’s Law Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 8, 1890, p. 7. ↩︎
“The Kiser Building”. The Atlanta Constitution, January 26, 1890, p. 19. ↩︎
“Kiser’s Law Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 8, 1890, p. 7. ↩︎
He wasn’t a nice man by any means: coarse, gruff, surly, and prone to cussing out clients and co-workers.
He wasn’t that much older than me, but looked ancient — a good fifty pounds overweight, bulging beer belly, balding head, and a thick, graying beard.
He had a wife and several children and clearly resented the role of family man, bitching about them constantly. The way he talked about women’s titties all the time, I knew he wasn’t getting any either.
On Mondays, he’d boast about being a deacon at his church, struggling to recall details of the preacher’s message. He liked the bits about punishing sinners the best, although he admitted to occasionally falling asleep during the sermon. As he blathered on about being a holy man, I’d secretly roll my eyes.
He was skilled at his profession, I suppose, but dumb as a rock about using a computer, which he masked with typical bravado. I sat near his desk and observed the same scenario many times:
He’d peck slowly at the keyboard, struggle to understand some basic program, mutter and sigh a lot before blurting out, “Something’s wrong with this computer. Must be a virus.”
That’s how he got into the habit of getting me to “fix” his computer. “It’s slowed down. Need you to clean it up,” he’d tell me, before barreling out the door. All I ever did was clear his browser history, making note of the porn sites he’d been visiting.
I guess he liked having someone as a wingman, so he started bringing me along to different work meetings, always hauling me around in his giant pickup truck. He’d rant and rave about the state of the world and talk about himself a lot, rarely asking anything about me. At some point, he started sliding his arm behind me while he was driving.
He usually took off early on Fridays, but one Friday afternoon, we had gone to a late meeting, and he still had to drop me off at the office — he didn’t even know where I lived. When we got into the truck, he suddenly said, “Going out with the wife tonight. Need to change my pants.”
Before I could respond, he was crawling into the back seat, his ass passing in front of my face. I knew in a flash what was happening. It wasn’t an invitation — I knew the kind of porn he liked, after all — but more a cry for someone to validate that he still had it.
Ok, I’ll play along, I thought. Somehow, I’d developed an affinity for the guy.
I watched in the rearview mirror as he took off his dirty jeans, awkwardly shifting and positioning his crotch so I could see it better. His thighs were wide and surprisingly pale and smooth.
The bulge in his tighty-whities was unremarkable, but the sight of it was no less jarring.
His breathing was labored as he pulled on a pair of tight black jeans. Then he opened the door, slammed it shut, and walked to the front.
As he sat down at the steering wheel, I shifted my eyes toward him without turning and said, coolly: “Looking good.”
“Thanks, man!” he beamed with a wide grin, zipping up his pants. I think I made his year.
Stanford White of McKim, Mead & White. The Cable Building (1893). Greenwich Village, New York.
The Cable Building is one of my favorite New York structures, mostly because I have fond memories associated with it, including the quiet Thanksgiving morning when I took the picture shown above.
Completed around late 1893, this 8-story steel-framed building1 includes a full basement and fronts on Broadway, Houston, and Mercer Streets on the border of Greenwich Village and NoHo.
The Cable Building was designed for the Broadway & Seventh Avenue Railway Company by Stanford White of McKim, Mead & White,2 and is a very early example of the Beaux-Arts style.
Southeast corner of The Cable Building
The building’s exterior was originally faced with Indiana limestone on the first and second floors, and the upper floors are covered in yellow brick and striking ornamental terra cotta,3 topped by an elaborate copper cornice.
Each floor encompasses nearly 20,000 square feet4 and encircles a central light court of more than 3,000 square feet.56 At its opening, the building’s first floor was designated for retail use, with the top three floors designed for offices and the middle floors reserved for warehouse space.7
My favorite part of the exterior is the classically-inspired sculpture of two robed women guarding the portico on the east facade, designed by J. Massey Rhind.8
J. Massey Rhind. Sculpture on the east facade of The Cable Building.
With that being said, the building’s overall design isn’t White’s best: the chamfered corners temper the appearance of bulkiness and provide interesting focal points, but the many large windows on every side of the structure clutter the composition, making it look messy and overwrought.
What makes the Cable Building impressive, however, is that it was designed to conceal a power plant for the street railway company, effectively creating “a building within a building”.9
Reaching 46 feet below the street surface,10the building’s basement originally housed 550 tons of machinery that powered the company’s cable cars, including wheels measuring 32 feet in diameter and weighing 50 tons each.11
Cornice on The Cable Building
The machinery has long since been removed, and today the Cable Building’s deep bowels house the Angelika Film Center, where there’s a chance you may find me some late evening, watching an indie flick as nearby subway trains rumble past.
References
“The Cable Building.” The New York Times, December 19, 1893, p. 9. ↩︎
Baker, Paul R.Stanny: The Gilded Life of Stanford White. New York: The Free Press (1989), pp. 213-14. ↩︎
“The Cable Building.” The New York Times, December 19, 1893, p. 9. ↩︎
John Portman and Associates. Skybridge to Gas Light Tower. Peachtree Center, Atlanta.
“We are trying to be as good as suburbia, by bringing nature back into the city. We are creating an urban environment where people walk. People don’t walk in suburbia. There are four rush hours there: morning, going to lunch, returning from lunch and going home. We have the only really pedestrian environment in the whole metro area.”
This sign at 74 Peachtree Street in Atlanta (previously 74 Whitehall Street) likely debuted with the Mangel’s store, which opened in May 19461 in a portion of the two surviving floors from the former Hirsch Building.2
Mangel’s was a New York-based retail chain3 that billed itself as “your headquarters for smart apparel at budget-saving prices,”4 and the Whitehall store was its second Atlanta location, with its first store in the city opening in 1919.5
Mangel’s operated at this location for decades, but seems to have quietly closed sometime after 1988.6
References
Advertisement. The Atlanta Journal, May 24, 1946, p. 10. ↩︎
“Realty Trades”. The Atlanta Constitution, August 24, 1935, p. 4. ↩︎
“Anniversary Sale At Mangel Store First Of Its Kind”. The Atlanta Journal, May 3, 1929, p. 31. ↩︎
Advertisement. The Atlanta Journal, May 24, 1946, p. 10. ↩︎
“Anniversary Sale At Mangel Store First Of Its Kind”. The Atlanta Journal, May 3, 1929, p. 31. ↩︎
“Retail Management” (advertisement). The Atlanta Journal and Constitution, October 2, 1988, p. 80-P. ↩︎