
The Background
People have always fucked each other, married or not. That was well understood in the late 19th century, but social standards at the time were often incongruent with reality, particularly for women.
Although officially illegal, prostitution at the time was tacitly accepted as a fact of life, and every city of any size, including Atlanta, had a red-light district, with local officials turning a blind eye — likely because they were patrons.
Pornography was available but not ubiquitous, so when the “fast young men”3 of Atlanta needed to get off, they were apt to visit the “disreputable houses” on Collins Street4 (later Courtland Street), of which the Atlanta newspapers spoke quite openly, and generally without judgment.
Expectations for women were quite different, however. Contraception was non-existent, so if a girl slept with a man — or God forbid was raped — well, she was screwed in more ways than one.
An unmarried pregnant woman was ostracized from the community, invariably shunned by her family, and often sent to a convent or “reformatory”, usually out of state.5 The man, of course, was free to live his life without consequence. Such were the good ol’ days to which some modern lunatics desire a return.
Times were changing, however, and the 1890s saw a movement toward establishing local “homes” or “refuges” to rehabilitate “fallen women”, a euphemism that covered a broad range of women, including unwed mothers, rape victims, and prostitutes.
In 1891, a group of Atlanta ministers proposed a Home for Fallen Women,6 7although the project was abandoned.8 A second attempt that year by a different group9 was opposed at every turn by residents who shrieked with moral outrage.10 11 12 13 14 The home was ultimately banned by city ordinance.15
Moral objections against the home were flimsy because Atlantans have never possessed any morals. At least one honest resident had the balls to address the real issue: “A home for fallen women, or any other institution which would destroy the value of our property, will have a hard road to travel if it is forced on us.”16
An anonymous “Reader” in The Atlanta Journal summed up the failure in April 1892:
“The movement failed, it seemed, only for the reason that so many opposed the location wherever it was spoken of on account of the proximity of Christian homes.
“Not a friendly word for that unfortunate class was said at the time that I remember by either of the newspapers of Atlanta or by any Christian man or woman.
“If Christ had been among us and owned a lot he would have said:
“‘Put it here.’ The spirit of the Nazarene rebukes such shabby pretense and stamps it ‘hypocrisy’”.17
In June 1892, another “Home for Fallen Women” attempted to open on Formwalt Street in southwest Atlanta. The city council balked at the idea,18 the neighbors predictably raised hell,19 20 and the matter was ultimately dropped.21
For whatever reason, W.W. Goodrich decided to wade into the matter, writing the following “suggestion” — he had so many of them — in The Atlanta Constitution.
Here, Goodrich describes his idea of a “retreat” for “imprudent young women”, complete with a dormitory, hospital, school, chapel, and hothouses, where the women would become “experts and adepts in the raising of fruits and flowers”.
“Consider the lilies of the field,” Goodrich quotes Christ. He then adds: “They could be paid commensurate with their dexterity”. I believe that’s from the Atlanta translation of the Bible.
A Suggestion For a Home.
Editor Constitution — Apropos of the location of a retreat for “imprudent young women,” please allow this suggestion, which has been tried with perfect success, and never failed to be the main spring out of which may be built a “retreat” that will not necessitate the upturned nostril of any sycophant at its close proximity.
In the west, and in the foreign climes, a society for the benevolent reclamation of unfortunate young women has purchased a tract of land near to a city of easy access, and upon said tract has erected a dormitory, hospital, kitchen and dining rooms, a bathhouse, a schoolroom and chapel upon the grounds, were also built for the sole occupation and employment of these young women. Hothouses of different sizes and for different fruits, flowers, plants and arbor culture in general. The young women did all of the manual labor in raising, propagating and growing whatever was planted.
An unlimited sale in this Atlanta market, at retail prices, is always at command for the products of such labor.
Such a home for these helpless young women would be a noble charity; they would be self-supporting, self-sustaining and self-respecting, and they would have an occupation that they would not hesitate to embrace.
They do not want sentiment; they do not want pity.
They do want disinterested, noble, clear-cut charity, and in this enlightened age they have a right to anticipate it.
When such a home is ready a special officer could go to the various stopping places of these young women, give them free of charge tickets for transportation to the retreat, invite them in a Christian, non-sectarian, unbiased manner to accept of the generous hospitality of the retreat, and I trow not but that they all would be only too glad to accept of so kind a proposition and of so good a home.
They would become experts and adepts in the raising of fruits and flowers, and what is more enjoyable than seeing flowers grow and bloom? Consider the lilies of the field; they could be paid commensurate with their dexterity.
The outline of this thought is from observation during my travels and is respectfully submitted to the noble minds who really with unostentation have the good of these unfortunate young women at heart.
W.W. GOODRICH.22
References
- “Plans Are Ready”. The Atlanta Journal, December 30, 1890, p. 1. ↩︎
- “Plans Ready”. The Atlanta Constitution, November 19, 1891, p. 2. ↩︎
- “Work Of The Courts”. The Atlanta Constitution, December 5, 1891, p. 9. ↩︎
- “She Was Robbed”. The Atlanta Journal, October 20, 1891, p. 1. ↩︎
- “That House of Refuge.” The Atlanta Constitution, November 13, 1891, p. 4. ↩︎
- “For Fallen Women”. The Atlanta Journal, April 6, 1981, p. 7. ↩︎
- “Raising The Fallen”. The Atlanta Constitution, April 7, 1981, p. 7. ↩︎
- “The Ministers Meet”. The Atlanta Constitution, September 8, 1891, p. 10. ↩︎
- “For Fallen Women.” The Atlanta Constitution, September 13, 1891, p. 21. ↩︎
- “For Fallen Women.” The Atlanta Journal, October 14, 1891, p. 6. ↩︎
- “Don’t Want It.” The Atlanta Journal, November 4, 1891, p. 3. ↩︎
- “Don’t Want It.” The Atlanta Constitution, November 5, 1891, p. 6. ↩︎
- “The Fallen Women”. The Atlanta Constitution, November 7, 1891, p. 9. ↩︎
- “That Refuge.” The Atlanta Journal, November 7, 1891, p. 3. ↩︎
- “The Mayor’s Name.” The Atlanta Constitution, November 8, 1891, p. 24. ↩︎
- ibid. ↩︎
- “The Idler’s Note Book”. The Atlanta Journal, April 27, 1892, p. 4. ↩︎
- “They Are Happy.” The Atlanta Constitution, June 7, 1892, p. 2. ↩︎
- “The Southsiders Object”. The Atlanta Journal, June 7, 1892, p. 3. ↩︎
- “They Will Oppose It.” The Atlanta Constitution, June 8, 1892, p. 9. ↩︎
- “That Liquor Law”. The Atlanta Constitution, June 21, 1892, p. 10. ↩︎
- Goodrich, W.W. “A Suggestion for a Home.” The Atlanta Constitution, June 10, 1892, p. 4. ↩︎








