Category: Extant Works by G.L. Norrman

  • 125 Edgewood Avenue (1889) – Atlanta

    G.L. Norrman (attributed). 125 Edgewood Avenue (1889). Atlanta.
    G.L. Norrman (attributed). 125 Edgewood Avenue (1889). Atlanta.

    This small commercial building on the southeast corner of Edgewood Avenue and Courtland Street in Downtown Atlanta would have been demolished long ago if it hadn’t served briefly as the first Coca-Cola bottling plant in the city. For that reason, the structure was designated as a National Historic Landmark in 1983.1

    Located at 125 Edgewood Avenue SE, the property is rare in Atlanta for maintaining the same numeric address for its entire existence. Local historians have long claimed the building was constructed in either 1890, 1891, or 1892. However, it’s well documented that the structure was built in 1889 and occupied in January 18902 3—Atlanta is appallingly ignorant of its own history.

    The building consists of two floors over a full basement,4 5 and is eclectically styled, incorporating Romanesque and Queen Anne elements. The exterior is covered in red brick with light granite trim, and the interior encompasses less than 6,000 square feet. While the architect is not officially known, all evidence indicates that G.L. Norrman was the designer.

    The Design

    Anyone with an eye for his work would quickly observe that the overall design and massing of 125 Edgewood Avenue are characteristic of Norrman, and many specific elements also suggest his involvement:

    • The oval window in the north gable was used by Norrman in multiple projects around the same time, including the Samuel McGowan House (1889) in Abbeville, South Carolina; the Atlanta & Edgewood Street Railway Shed (1889) and 897 Edgewood Avenue (1890) in Inman Park, and most notably, the nearby Exchange Building (1889, pictured below).
    • Chimneys with tapered tops were a trademark element of Norrman’s in the 1880s and 1890s, and the same chimney designs were used in his 1889 plan for the H.M. Potts House (demolished) in Atlanta’s West End.
    • The central chimney stack on the north side of the building serves as a focal point to visually balance the elevation’s two incongruent halves—a common technique used by Norrman in his compositions.
    • A terracotta volute on the central chimneystack is of the same design as those used in Norrman’s designs for the Windsor Hotel (1892) in Americus, Georgia, and the Edgewood Avenue Grammar School (1892) in Atlanta.
    • The stepped gables on the north and west sides of the building were incorporated in Norrman’s design for the nearby Exchange Building and later used on the Windsor Hotel.
    • The Romanesque granite column on the northwest corner of the ground floor is a smaller version of one used in Norrman’s design for the Printup Hotel (1888) in Gadsden, Alabama.
    • The porch on the west side of the building uses the same posts with curved brackets seen in Norrman’s design for the E.A. Hawkins House (1890) in Americus, Georgia, and the house at 897 Edgewood Avenue in Inman Park.
    • The fish-scale shingles used in both the turret and balcony were incorporated into Norrman’s designs for the McGowan House, and the T.P. Ivy House (1895) in Atlanta, among others.
    • The most obvious design clue is the square turret on the building’s northwest corner, which is a duplicate of one Norrman used in the H.M. Potts House the same year.6
    G.L. Norrman. H.M. Potts House (1889, demolished). West End, Atlanta.
    G.L. Norrman. H.M. Potts House (1889, demolished). West End, Atlanta.7

    The Background

    The building at 125 Edgewood Avenue was one of at least three commercial spec structures built along Edgewood Avenue by Joel Hurt’s East Atlanta Land Company—it appears Norrman designed all of them.

    Norrman was a preferred architect for Hurt in the late 1880s and early 1890s, with four confirmed projects for Hurt’s companies and family, and four additional structures that can be attributed to him. He was also one of the opening-day tenants in Hurt’s Equitable Building (completed in 1892 and demolished in 1971), occupying a suite of offices on the top floor.8

    The full list of Norrman’s completed projects for the Hurt companies and family follows:

    • Exchange Building, completed 18899 and demolished 193910 11 – intersection of Edgewood Avenue and Gilmer Street, Atlanta [Map]
    • 125 Edgewood Avenue, completed 1889 [Map] – design attributed to Norrman
    • Commercial building, completed 1892 and demolished 1939 – 161-165 Edgewood Avenue, SW corner of Edgewood and Piedmont Avenues, Atlanta [Map] – design attributed to Norrman
    • Three spec houses for the East Atlanta Land Company
      • Thomas W. Latham House, completed 1889 – 804 Edgewood Avenue NE; Inman Park, Atlanta [Map]
      • Edgewood Avenue House, completed 1890 – 897 Edgewood Avenue NE; Inman Park, Atlanta [Map]
      • Euclid Avenue House, completed 1890 – 882 Euclid Avenue, Inman Park, Atlanta [Map]
    • Atlanta & Edgewood Street Railway Shed, completed 1889 – 963 Edgewood Avenue NE; Inman Park, Atlanta [Map] – design attributed to Norrman
    • C. D. Hurt House, completed 1893 – 36 Delta Place; Inman Park, Atlanta [Map] – design attributed to Norrman
    G.L. Norrman. Exchange Building (1889, demolished 1938). Atlanta.
    G.L. Norrman. Exchange Building (1889, demolished 1938). Atlanta.12

    The Beginning of Edgewood Avenue

    The East Atlanta Land Company created Edgewood Avenue to serve as the main artery from Atlanta’s commercial district to the company’s suburban residential development, Inman Park.13

    Joel Hurt was, by all accounts, a miserable bastard. He was also filthy rich, so of course, he felt entitled to receive whatever he wanted, running to the local press—often his sympathetic friends at The Atlanta Constitution—to whine petulantly when local leaders didn’t bow to his incessant demands.

    In 1886, Hurt and his associates began pestering the city council to widen and extend an existing road called Foster Street,14 15 16 17 18 which ran from Atlanta’s Calhoun Street (later Piedmont Avenue) to the foot of Hurt’s 75-acre property near the Air-Line Railroad (later Belt Line Railroad).

    Hurt also wanted the city to extend Foster Street from Calhoun Street westward to Ivy Street (later Peachtree Center Avenue), connecting it with another thoroughfare called Line Street (later Hurt Plaza), ending at the Five Points intersection in the center of the city.

    Part of what made the scheme so contentious was that Hurt demanded the city of Atlanta use eminent domain to remove homes and buildings along the route.

    The city council initially rebuffed Hurt’s proposal in June 1886,19 but mysteriously reversed course and approved it in August 1886.20 21

    Hurt (pictured here) formed the East Atlanta Land Company the following year, with the expressed intention of developing his 75-acre estate and “building a street car line down Foster Street to the Boulevard and on through this suburban property.”22

    Hurt’s demands for the project kept growing, and following nearly two years of discussion and revisions, the City of Atlanta and the East Atlanta Land Company finally settled on a deal, the details of which are too tedious to elaborate on.

    Ultimately, both parties funded the construction of the street, while Hurt agreed to give ownership to the city, which, in turn, agreed to condemn any property or building along the route that Hurt’s company couldn’t purchase or remove through its own negotiations with property owners.23 24 25 26 27 28

    As the project was underway, Foster Street was renamed Edgewood Avenue, which the Constitution described as “A Pretty Street with a Pretty Name…And the Men Who Made It Are Also Very Pretty, Etc. Etc.”29 So much for objective journalism.

    It should come as no surprise that the area cleared for Edgewood Avenue was largely inhabited by poor and Black residents, a foreshadowing of Atlanta’s widespread clearance of low-income areas for freeways in the 1950s and 60s, the largest act of wholesale destruction in the city’s history (no, it wasn’t Sherman).

    For their part, local newspapers had nothing but praise for Hurt’s project. In 1888, the Constitution predictably gushed:

    “The objectionable houses that stood on Line Street have been torn down and now Edgewood avenue runs over the very spot where they once stood. The tearing down of these old houses and removing them from the heart of the city is an act the city should thank the company for.”30

    “Objectionable houses,” incidentally, was a polite euphemism for brothels.

    The Macon Telegraph was a little more explicit, explaining that the brick houses on Line Street “were once notorious resorts”, and that “the inmates [have] been required to move on to Collins Street” (later Courtland Street),31 which became Atlanta’s red-light district.

    In a speech from September 1888, Hurt revealed the extent of the clearance:

    “We have conducted negotiations with one hundred and thirty two property owners … it has been necessary to condemn the properties of about thirty parties. It has been necessary to move ninety buildings…We have destroyed $70,000 worth of brick and stone buildings alone.”32

    Buried in the same speech was the following note:

    “There are four properties of private individuals and one of the Atlanta street railroad company, extending slightly in the street, and at these points work has been delayed because of legal difficulties.”33

    If Hurt’s description feels conveniently sanitized, a lawsuit filed by a property owner on Edgewood Avenue hints at the true contentious nature of the project.

    In September 1888, Dennis F. O’Sullivan sued the East Atlanta Land Company for its seizure and destruction of his property on Edgewood Avenue.34 O’Sullivan alleged that the company “took forcible possession of [his] premises, moved two of his houses a considerable distance…and then filled in a strip of land…making it higher than the other part of his property, so that water collects there as in a basin.”

    O’Sullivan additionally sued the City of Atlanta, because he claimed that he was “prevented by interfering from the police.” Cops defending monied interests? Shocker.

    By the time Edgewood Avenue formally opened on September 26, 1888,35 the East Atlanta Land Company owned most of the property along the 2-mile route, which was accurately described as “the only perfectly straight street of any length in the city,”36 running from Five Points to Inman Park.

    Hurt’s Atlanta & Edgewood Street Railroad Company (better known as the A&E) became the first electric street railway in Georgia when it debuted on August 22, 1889.37 Running on double tracks, the “new-fangled street car”38 glided at a cool 18 miles per hour39 along Edgewood Avenue, which city workers finished paving with Belgian block just four days earlier.40

    North elevation of 125 Edgewood Avenue
    North elevation of 125 Edgewood Avenue

    Construction and History

    Two weeks before the trolley’s debut, the building permit for 125 Edgewood Avenue was issued in early August 1889, with construction supervised by B.R. Padgett,41 a prolific contractor who in later years marketed himself as an architect (he wasn’t). Construction on the project was swift, with only four months from the date the permit was issued to the building’s opening.

    Joel Hurt regularly employed convict labor in his civic projects, and chain gangs loaned by Fulton County were used in the construction of Edgewood Avenue.42 However, Hurt’s nearby Exchange Building was built with paid day labor,43 and 125 Edgewood was likely completed in the same manner.

    Even if convicts didn’t work on the building, its distinctive red-clay bricks were almost certainly manufactured by the Chattahoochee Brick Company near Atlanta, which also ran on forced prison labor.44

    Open House

    Hanye Grocery Company was 125 Edgewood’s first tenant, opening on the ground floor in January 1890. Advertising itself as “The Prettiest Store and most Complete Grocery House in the South”, and “the finest this side of Baltimore, without any exaggeration”, the store purportedly offered “the finest fancy and domestic goods”.45

    The store’s owner was R.M. Hanye, who moved his grocery business from a smaller space on Decatur Street. “I cordially invite the ladies to visit my grocery in the magnificent new brick building…”, Hanye proclaimed in newspaper ads.46

    The new store was described as “palatial” by The Atlanta Journal, which noted the “three handsome double entrances” and marveled that “A person can enter the door at one end of the store and walk to the other end, taking a good view of the entire stock, and come out at the further entrance on the same street (Edgewood avenue.)”47

    Unique in Atlanta, the building was designed so that the business proprietor could reside in the residential space above the store, accessible from Courtland Street via the porch built halfway between the first and second floors.

    The concept even received national attention: An 1890 article in Architecture and Building mentioned Norrman’s similar design for the nearby Exchange Building, reporting, “A novel scheme for utilizing a triangular corner lot was evolved by Mr. Norrman, giving two residences over a store.”48

    In 125 Edgewood, it appears the second-floor living space consisted of two large rooms and a bathroom, which were quickly divided into one-room apartments, based on a description in a 1896 advertisement.49 According to city directories from 1890 and 1891, Hanye both lived and worked in the building,50 51 although future tenants in the retail space lived off-site.

    The Hanye Grocery Company was officially incorporated in July 1890,52 with Joel Hurt listed as one of the owners.53 A hand-painted sign advertising the grocery is still faintly visible on the east side of the building, although it has long outlasted the business.

    R.M. Hanye sign on the east elevation of 125 Edgewood Avenue
    R.M. Hanye sign on the east elevation of 125 Edgewood Avenue

    In 1891, the Hanye Grocery Company reincorporated itself—without Hanye or Hurt—as the Atlanta Grocery Company,54 which closed by 1893, replaced by Hosch & Son grocers.55 In 1894, the space was occupied by yet another grocery, operated by Mrs. F.A. Holleran.56

    From 1895 to 1898, 125 Edgewood Avenue housed Star Grocery, operated by John M. Waddill,57 58 59 and in 1895, the building also briefly housed a photography studio operated by Hugh Schmidt.60 61 In 1899, the building was vacant.62

    The essential problem with the building’s location was already apparent in 1890, when Hanye’s ads stressed that his store was “Only three minutes’ ride on the Atlanta and Edgewood electric cars.”63 It was simply too far from the heart of Atlanta’s commercial district, primarily centered 3 blocks west at the intersection of Whitehall, Decatur, and Marietta Streets.

    The East Atlanta Land Company clearly hoped that the building’s tenants would capture the business of trolley riders shuttling to and from Inman Park, yet, despite a wide-scale promotional blitz, early home sales in Inman Park were anemic.

    Many of the giant spec houses planned by Atlanta’s leading architects sat empty for years or were rented out before Inman Park was swallowed up by the encroaching city and filled with smaller, cheaper homes in the early 20th century.

    Peachtree Street remained the preferred address of the city’s elite for at least 20 years after Inman Park’s opening, and for the old-money families of Atlanta (whatever that meant in a 53-year-old city), the suburb could only have been viewed as a gauche, far-out enclave for the nouveau riche.

    Stepped gable on the north elevation of 125 Edgewood Avenue
    Stepped gable on the north elevation of 125 Edgewood Avenue

    The Coca-Cola Year

    Beginning circa April 1900,64 the Dixie Coca-Cola Bottling Company occupied 125 Edgewood for about 8 months, a tenancy so short-lived that the company’s presence isn’t even listed in city directories from the time, although newspaper classified ads confirm it.

    One such ad requested: “Three boys about 17 to do rough light work; must be hustlers and willing to work cheap.”65 No comment necessary.

    Typical of most Atlanta enterprises, Coca-Cola’s origins are shady and convoluted, but the product first debuted in 1886 as a medicinal tonic at Jacobs’ Pharmacy on Marietta Street, and steadily gained regional and national popularity as an alternative to alcohol when Atlanta and other cities began dabbling in prohibition. “The proper use of it will make a drunken man sober,” the ever-truthful Constitution claimed.66

    In 1898, Coca-Cola opened new headquarters one block east of 125 Edgewood Avenue at the intersection of Edgewood and College Street (later named Coca-Cola Place), with a 3-story brick building designed by Bruce & Morgan and owned by the East Atlanta Land Company. 67 68 69 70

    An important distinction is that it wasn’t the Coca-Cola Company that operated from 125 Edgewood Avenue, but an entirely separate bottling company licensed to distribute Coca-Cola’s product in the Southeast.71

    Contrary to Coke’s corporate mythmaking, the company has long been a stodgy, insular, and conservative entity with a flair for empty self-promotion—not unlike Atlanta itself. In Coca-Cola’s early years, the beverage could only be purchased at soda fountains, and the company’s president, Asa G. Candler, didn’t see the value in bottling it.

    In 1899, Candler reluctantly agreed to grant bottling rights to J.B. Whitehead and B.F. Thomas, who subsequently established the Dixie Coca-Cola Bottling Company to distribute the soda throughout the Southeast. Starting their first bottling plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee, the men then opened a second plant at 125 Edgewood in Atlanta.72

    In 1900, Coca-Cola reportedly sold 51,147 gallons in Atlanta 73—that appears to be separate from the product bottled at 125 Edgewood, and it’s unclear how much was distributed from the building, but it couldn’t have been substantial. The plant’s output was limited by the size of its marketing territory, which was reportedly measured by how far a mule team could travel in a day.74

    By January 1901, the Dixie Coca-Cola plant vacated 125 Edgewood and moved to 35 Ivy Street.75

    In truth, Coke’s connection with 125 Edgewood is barely worth noting, but Atlanta has destroyed so much of its history that it has to cling to whatever remnants it can to pretend it has a cultural legacy beyond hype, moneymaking, and oppression.

    After Coca-Cola

    It’s also unclear when the East Atlanta Land Company sold 125 Edgewood, but with the failure of Inman Park and other projects, coupled with the severe financial depression of the mid-to-late 1890s, the company shed its assets in multiple auctions over the next decade.

    Hurt seemingly lost interest in the company as he threw his energy and attention into the management of the Atlanta Consolidated Street Railway Company, formed in 1891 by the merger of the A&E and 5 other street railway companies,76 77 as well as the establishment that same year of the bank that would become the Trust Company of Georgia.78

    The East Atlanta Land Company auctioned off the bulk of its Edgewood Avenue commercial property in 1903 79 80 81 82— including its Exchange Place property and the Coca-Cola headquarters83—followed by a final sale of its remaining assets in 1906.84 85 86 87 88 It appears that 125 Edgewood was likely sold in 1903, as the property wasn’t listed in the 1906 auction.89

    Looking at 125 Edgewood Avenue from the northeast
    Looking at 125 Edgewood Avenue from the northeast

    For the next 20 years, 125 Edgewood hosted a revolving door of short-lived businesses:

    • In December 1901, a grocery store operated by a man named Charles with the last name of either Charalambedis, Charalambitis,90 or Charalampe91 declared bankruptcy, selling a “stock of groceries and fixtures…including counters, show cases, and two soda founts…”92
    • In May 1902, an entirely different grocery store, operated by I. Goldberg, also declared bankruptcy, selling its stock of “staple and fancy groceries fresh and in good condition, show cases, computing scales, coffee mill and other fixtures usually belonging to such business”.93
    • In 1903, the space was occupied by L.C. Johnson and Company, described as “retail grocers and restaurant”.94
    • In 1904, a cigar business owned by Henry I. Palmer was listed at the address.95
    • In October 1904, a drug store at the location went into receivership, selling off “one stock of drugs and fixtures, stock bottles and show cases, one soda fount and all attachments; also one carbonator, filler, and Crown machine, almost new”. The store was advertised as “A splendid opportunity for a live young man.”96
    • A drug store operated by George C. Mizell operated at the address in 1905.97
    • In 1906, the ground floor of the building was occupied by Central Pharmacy, with Virgil A. Jones, a barber, on the second floor.98 In January 1906, a “12-syrup soda fount, A1 condition, cheap, if sold at once”, was advertised at the address.99
    • Central Pharmacy was still in business in 1907, operated by Henry F. Askam, although the barber shop was replaced by a “pressing club” operated by John R. Thomason.100
    • By 1908, Central Pharmacy had become the Askam & Alford pharmacy, operated by Askam with N.E. Alford.101 The business was again called Central Pharmacy in 1909.102
    • In 1909, J.B. Peyton applied for a transfer of a near-beer license at the address from J. Bigler.103 Georgia enacted Prohibition in 1907, so saloons at the time only served non-alcoholic beverages. Ahem.
    • Peyton’s saloon was still in operation in 1910, occupying the ground floor,104 but Peyton transferred the license to George N. Weekes in December 1910.105 That year, the top-floor apartment was occupied by two men: James Lindsey and William T. Culbreath.106
    • In 1911, the structure was owned by the Adair family’s local real estate empire, and a building permit was issued for $220 in fire damage repair.107
    • In 1912, the building housed another saloon, operated by William T. Murray.108
    • From 1913 to 1916, a saloon and pool room operated by Louis Silverman was located in the building,109 110 111 112
    • In 1917, the Turman & Calhoun real estate company advertised the building’s “clean storeroom”, noting it was “within three minutes of Peachtree”.113
    • Directories from 1918 list the building space as vacant,114 but by August of that year, the building housed the Atlanta Screen and Cabinet Works, owned by J.W. Biggers.115
    • In 1920 and 1921, the space was occupied by a dry goods store operated by Harris Roughlin.116 117
    • In 1922, the Mazliah & Cohen dry goods store operated in the space,118 and by 1923, it had been replaced with a dry goods store owned by Joe Horwitz.119
    • In 1924, a “well-established millinery business” at the address was listed for sale.120
    Ground floor window on the northeast corner of 125 Edgewood Avenue
    Ground floor window on the northeast corner of 125 Edgewood Avenue

    The Briscoe-Morgan Murder-Suicide

    The ground-floor space at 125 Edgewood was occupied by B. and B. Clothing Company121—a store owned by J.W. Biggers of Atlanta Screen and Cabinet Works fame—when it was the scene of a murder-suicide in 1924.122 123

    On August 7, 1924, Fannie Briscoe, a 36-year-old saleswoman at the business, was shot to death by W.R.L. Morgan, a 52-year-old insurance salesman who had reportedly been in a relationship with Briscoe. Immediately after killing her, Morgan turned the pistol around and shot himself in the head, “falling dead at Mrs. Briscoe’s feet.”124

    The scene was witnessed by a man repairing his tire outside the store, who reported that Briscoe screamed “Don’t do that! Don’t do that” in the moments before she was killed.125

    Newspapers at the time described a typical Atlanta romance: Briscoe had divorced her first husband and was separated from her second when she began a relationship with Morgan. The two “became infatuated with each other” and lived together in an apartment on Pryor Street, but had recently broken up.126

    A police investigator explained that “Morgan’s mind seemed to have become somewhat unbalanced following this separation and he became deeply depressed at times.”127

    Three letters found in Morgan’s pocket addressed various aspects of post-mortem business, with such tedious and clichéd phrasing as: “I am tired of life. The world has gone back on me.”

    Apparently fond of morose prose, Morgan left another letter in his apartment, in which he moaned: “Fannie Briscoe is the cause of it all. I can’t stand the way she has done me. That’s all. Good by to all.”128

    Even in death, Atlantans are narcissistic and boring.

    Stepped gable on the west elevation of 125 Edgewood Avenue
    Stepped gable on the west elevation of 125 Edgewood Avenue

    Crime and Seediness

    Early claims that Edgewood Avenue would “attract the rich and fashionable to live upon it”129 were pure Atlanta bullshit, and while never a prestige address, it’s clear that 125 Edgewood quickly became just as seedy and crime-ridden as the properties demolished for the street’s construction a few years earlier.

    Recall that in 1889, the “inmates” of the former Line Street had simply been pushed over to Courtland Street, so of course, the location was destined to draw an unsavory element.

    In October 1906, the building’s second floor was raided by police for housing an illegal gambling establishment. Twelve men were arrested during a game of poker,130 in which “it was found necessary to break in one or two doors”, according to the Journal, which added: “it is said that Sergeant Lanford swung a sledge hammer like a veteran blacksmith.”131

    In 1916, Louis Silverman, the proprietor of a pool room and saloon in the building, was ordered to appear in court for allowing minors to play,132 apparently leading to the closure of the business.

    In 1924, less than a month after the murder-suicide, the B. and B. Clothing Company was robbed of a satin dress.133

    In 1925, the space housed a store operated by Morris Jackson, which was robbed in an overnight burglary that resulted in the loss of 15 dozen pairs of hosiery, 13 shirts, 12 pairs of suspenders, and 23 necklaces.134

    In September 1928, the building was occupied by the Atlas Dry Goods Store when it was robbed again—this time of 20 dresses. 135 Three months later, the store’s “show window” was smashed in during an overnight robbery attempt.136

    One 1982 article from the Constitution said of the property: “There is even evidence to suggest that, at one down-at-the-heels juncture in its past, the second story was a house of ill repute disguised as a boarding home.”137 The mind boggles.

    Squared corner turret on 125 Edgewood Avenue
    Squared corner turret on 125 Edgewood Avenue

    Occupants in the Mid-20th Century

    Following the 1924 murder-suicide, 125 Edgewood hosted a few more short-lived businesses, although occupancy at the location stabilized through mid-century:

    • In October 1925, a “candy kitchen, fully equipped” was auctioned off at the location.138
    • In December 1925, a restaurant owned by O.G. Hughes operated from the building, where his 2-year-old son was severely scalded by a pot of boiling water.139 140
    • The Warner Heating and Plumbing Company operated from the building, circa 1930-1936.141 142
    • A shop selling sandwiches and drinks, doing nice business” with “low rent” was advertised in the Business Opportunities section of the Constitution classifieds in 1935.143
    • The Shepard Decorating Company was owned by Virgil W. Shepard, who bought the building from the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company in 1939144 and operated the business there until 1951.145 146 147
    • Brown Radio Sales & Service, a Philco dealership, operated at 125 Edgewood from 1952 to 1969.148 149
    Ground floor window on the north side of 125 Edgewood Avenue
    Ground floor window on the north side of 125 Edgewood Avenue

    Reassessment

    After years of neglect, in 1966150 the Atlanta Baptist Association purchased 125 Edgewood with plans to demolish it, but when Georgia State University identified the property as one it intended to include in its campus expansion plans, the organization instead kept the building to sell to the university.151

    While it waited for Georgia State to purchase the property, in 1969, the association opened the Baptist Student Union at 125 Edgewood.152 You gotta stash the kids somewhere, right? What started as a temporary tenancy became the building’s longest occupancy.

    Georgia State abandoned its plan to purchase 125 Edgewood circa 1976, when the building was nominated to the National Register of Historic Places.153

    In 1978, the building was additionally nominated as a National Historic Landmark. The Historic Preservation Section of Georgia’s Department of Natural Resources submitted the nomination,154 citing the building’s connection to Coca-Cola, although the company’s executives—esconced in their dreary concrete fortress on North Avenue—apparently wanted nothing to do with it.

    “The Coca-Cola people weren’t overjoyed by the nomination,” recalled a historian from the DNR, adding: “Perhaps they didn’t want such a tacky little building representing them.”155

    A Coca-Cola spokesperson responded with bland corporate diplomacy: “I don’t think we would object to it being on the list, but I don’t think we would have pushed it either.”156 Is it any wonder Atlanta never saves a damn thing?

    Second-story windows on the north elevation of 125 Edgewood Avenue
    Second-story windows on the north elevation of 125 Edgewood Avenue

    Constricted by the building’s new historic designations, the Atlanta Baptist Association decided to renovate 125 Edgewood, which by the early 1980s was in a visible state of disrepair but described as “extremely sound.”157

    Photographs from 1976 reveal the many alterations that occurred over the years: the building’s brick facade had been painted, the ground-floor corner windows were boarded over, and the original porch and balcony had been removed.

    “One of the things about the building is that it looks like it’s not occupied,” explained one of the student union’s leaders. “You can walk by and think no one’s here.”158

    A renovation and expansion plan was completed in 1980 by Cavender/Kordys Associates Inc.,159 a small architectural firm from nearby East Point, Georgia.160 The firm estimated the project would cost $475,000, and the association began a fundraising campaign to pay for it.161

    By 1987, the renovation had yet to begin, and the building’s structural integrity had so deteriorated that it was reported to the United States Congress as a Threatened National Historic Landmark.162

    Renovation and Addition

    Renovation of 125 Edgewood began in 1989,163 164 including a reconstruction of the porch and a shortened version of the second-floor balcony, using a 1893 photograph of the building as a design reference.165

    The building’s windows were replaced with replicas of the originals, the paint was removed from the brick, and the broken chimneystack on the north side was rebuilt.

    For the modern addition, a small, unobtrusive wing was attached to the south side of the building, with matching brick and granite stringcourses to complement the historic structure and provide the student union with extra space.

    The project restored the building’s outer shell, but no attempt was made to restore the interior to its former appearance—the original stairwells were ripped out, walls were removed to create open meeting space, and the ceilings were covered in standard 1980s acoustic tile.

    A 2003 update to the building’s landmark nomination form explained that the renovation, combined with 100 years of previous interior changes, had “altered the original floor plan to where it is virtually indiscernible.”166

    Reconstructed porch on the west elevation of 125 Edgewood Avenue
    Reconstructed porch on the west elevation of 125 Edgewood Avenue

    Return to Dilapidation

    Atlanta abhors maintaining its historic buildings—or anything, for that matter—and in the early 21st century, 125 Edgewood again shows signs of long-term neglect.

    Visible issues in 2025 included a broken window in the corner turret covered with a flimsy tarp, rotting wood on the porch and balcony, missing shingles, and a mysterious dark stain running down the side of the porch. Images from the same year revealed the interior’s dilapidated state, including major flooding in the basement.167

    Nearly 60 years after it moved into the building, in December 2024, the BCM at Georgia State (formerly the Baptist Student Union) vacated 125 Edgewood,168 and the property was placed for sale, marketed as ‘one of the last “true” relatively untouched Victorian mansions left downtown’,169 an erroneous statement in every conceivable fashion. The building is currently abandoned.

    An Uncertain Future

    As of 2026, the future of 125 Edgewood Avenue is anything but certain.

    The building’s National Historic Landmark status doesn’t amount to much, as proven by Atlanta University Center’s Stone Hall (1882), also designed by Norrman and designated as a National Historic Landmark. Abandoned in 2003, Stone Hall has been heavily vandalized and in a state of rapid deterioration for years, with no meaningful funding or plans to return it to viable use.

    Because 125 Edgewood is designated as a City of Atlanta Landmark, the structure is well protected from demolition,170 but it’s unclear how the building could be suitably repurposed, as it’s too small and poorly positioned for a public-facing business.

    Parking at the location is also limited, and Atlantans value their vehicles more than their lives, so if a business isn’t within feet of cheap, abundant parking, it has no chance of survival.

    The building appropriately sits on the route for the revived Atlanta Streetcar, although that, too, doesn’t count for much. Atlanta’s streetcar is an absolute failure of a vanity project that’s barely used by anyone—that is, if it’s even running at all.

    The one certainty about the property is this: despite its unique design and historic significance, 125 Edgewood has never been a good place for a business.

    Looking at 125 Edgewood Avenue from the west
    Looking at 125 Edgewood Avenue from the west

    References

    1. National Historic Landmark Nomination: Dixie Coca-Cola Bottling Company Plant ↩︎
    2. “The City Council.” The Atlanta Constitution, August 6, 1889, p. 5. ↩︎
    3. “Georgia’s Prettiest”. The Atlanta Journal, January 14, 1890, p. 7. ↩︎
    4. “Miscellaneous.” The Atlanta Constitution, March 28, 1895, p. 9. ↩︎
    5. National Historic Landmark Nomination: Dixie Coca-Cola Bottling Company Plant ↩︎
    6. “Society Gossip.” The Atlanta Constitution, October 9, 1889, p. 4. ↩︎
    7. “West End.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 27, 1890, p. 21. ↩︎
    8. “In the Equitable.” The Atlanta Constitution, May 31, 1892, p. 7. ↩︎
    9. “Home Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, March 20, 1889, p. 8. ↩︎
    10. “Old City Hall Site Exchange Effective April 15”. The Atlanta Journal, April 10, 1939, p. 4. ↩︎
    11. “Mayor Requests $25,000 Gifts For Auditorium Park”. The Atlanta Constitution, August 30, 1939, p. 9. ↩︎
    12. Carson, O.E. The Trolley Titans: A Mobile History of Atlanta. Glendale, California: Interurban Press (1981). ↩︎
    13. “Building a Suburb”, The Atlanta Constitution, November 6, 1887, p. 5. ↩︎
    14. “Important Petition.” The Atlanta Journal, February 1, 1886, p. 1. ↩︎
    15. “Opening a New Street.” The Atlanta Constitution, March 24, 1886, p. 7. ↩︎
    16. “To Meet Tomorrow.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 21, 1886, p. 7. ↩︎
    17. “The Aldermanic Board.” The Atlanta Journal, May 6, 1886, p. 1. ↩︎
    18. “The Board of Aldermen.” The Atlanta Constitution, May 7, 1886, p. 7. ↩︎
    19. “The Foster Street Extension.” The Atlanta Constitution, June 8, 1886, p. 1. ↩︎
    20. “Our City Legislature.” The Atlanta Journal, August 3, 1886, p. 1. ↩︎
    21. “Aldermanic Board.” The Atlanta Journal, August 5, 1886, p. 4. ↩︎
    22. “Another Grand Enterprise.” The Atlanta Journal, May 9, 1887, p. 4. ↩︎
    23. “A Liberal Offer.” The Atlanta Constitution, February 7, 1888, p. 8. ↩︎
    24. “The Foster Street Extension.” The Atlanta Constitution, February 17, 1888, p. 7. ↩︎
    25. “Foster Street.” The Atlanta Constitution, February 18, 1888, p. 7. ↩︎
    26. “Foster Street.” The Atlanta Constitution, February 19, 1888, p. 14. ↩︎
    27. “Whisky and Streets”. The Atlanta Constitution, February 21, 1888, p. 5. ↩︎
    28. “They All Like It.” The Atlanta Constitution, February 22, 1888, p. 5. ↩︎
    29. “The New Avenue”. The Atlanta Constitution, September 5, 1888, p. 5. ↩︎
    30. “Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, December 16, 1888, p. 22. ↩︎
    31. “Clearing Away Houses.” The Macon Telegraph, August 2, 1888, p. 4. ↩︎
    32. “Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, December 16, 1888, p. 22. ↩︎
    33. ibid. ↩︎
    34. “About the Steps.” The Atlanta Constitution, September 6, 1888, p. 5. ↩︎
    35. “The New Street.” The Atlanta Constitution, September 27, 1888, p. 7. ↩︎
    36. “We, Us and Co.” The Atlanta Constitution, August 14, 1887, p. 4. ↩︎
    37. Carson, O.E. The Trolley Titans: A Mobile History of Atlanta. Glendale, California: Interurban Press (1981), p. 12. ↩︎
    38. “For Inman Park.” The Atlanta Constitution, August 21, 1889, p. 8. ↩︎
    39. Electric Street Cars.” The Atlanta Journal, April 13, 1889, p. 2. ↩︎
    40. “Changing Atlanta.” The Atlanta Constitution, August 18, 1889, p. 16. ↩︎
    41. “The City Council.” The Atlanta Constitution, August 6, 1889, p. 5. ↩︎
    42. “Through the City”. The Atlanta Constitution, April 30, 1888, p. 5. ↩︎
    43. “Home Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, March 20, 1889, p. 8. ↩︎
    44. “The City Council.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 20, 1886, p. 5. ↩︎
    45. “The Grocery” (advertisement). The Atlanta Journal, January 23, 1890, p. 3. ↩︎
    46. ibid. ↩︎
    47. “Georgia’s Prettiest”. The Atlanta Journal, January 14, 1890, p. 7. ↩︎
    48. Boorman, T.H. “Through Georgia.” Architecture and Building, Volume 13, No. 1 (July 5, 1890), p. 8. ↩︎
    49. “ROOMS — Furnished or Unfurnished.” The Atlanta Constitution, December 27, 1896, p. 23. ↩︎
    50. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1890) ↩︎
    51. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1891) ↩︎
    52. “The Hanye Company.” The Atlanta Constitution, July 1, 1890, p. 2. ↩︎
    53. Legal notice. The Atlanta Journal, June 4, 1890, p. 7. ↩︎
    54. “In the Courts.” The Atlanta Constitution, March 10, 1891, p. 8. ↩︎
    55. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1893) ↩︎
    56. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1894) ↩︎
    57. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1896) ↩︎
    58. “Miscellaneous.” (advertisement) The Atlanta Constitution, March 28, 1895, p. 9. ↩︎
    59. “Red Trading Stamps.” (advertisement) The Atlanta Journal, June 17, 1898, p. 11. ↩︎
    60. “Wanted — Help — Female.” (advertisement) The Atlanta Journal, August 17, 1895, p. 11. ↩︎
    61. “Instruction.” (advertisement) The Atlanta Constitution, September 15, 1895, p. 22. ↩︎
    62. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1899) ↩︎
    63. “The Grocery” (advertisement). The Atlanta Journal, January 23, 1890, p. 3. ↩︎
    64. “Coca-Cola Carbonated.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 8, 1900, p. 9. ↩︎
    65. “HELP Wanted—Male.” (advertisement) The Atlanta Constitution, July 6, 1900, p. 9. ↩︎
    66. “The Story of Coca-Cola”. The Atlanta Constitution, November 20, 1901, p. 4. ↩︎
    67. “Lights and Shades.” The Atlanta Constitution, March 9, 1898, p. 9. ↩︎
    68. “Coca Cola Company Begins New Building”. The Atlanta Journal, March 18, 1898, p. 3. ↩︎
    69. “Many Visitors Present.”The Atlanta Constitution, December 14, 1898, p. 11. ↩︎
    70. “Coco-Cola Building Has Been Opened”. The Atlanta Journal, December 15, 1898, p. 12. ↩︎
    71. National Historic Landmark Nomination: Dixie Coca-Cola Bottling Company Plant ↩︎
    72. ibid. ↩︎
    73. “The Story of Coca-Cola”. The Atlanta Constitution, November 20, 1901, p. 4. ↩︎
    74. Walker, Tom. “Coca-Cola Bottling: 75
      Refreshing Years”. The Atlanta Journal, July 25, 1975, p. 3-C. ↩︎
    75. “Lost.” (advertisement) The Atlanta Constitution, January 5, 1901, p. 6. ↩︎
    76. “The Deal Closed.” The Atlanta Constitution, March 15, 1891, p. 20. ↩︎
    77. “Articles of Incorporation”. The Atlanta Journal, April 10, 1891, p. 3. ↩︎
    78. Carson, O.E. The Trolley Titans: A Mobile History of Atlanta. Glendale, California: Interurban Press (1981). ↩︎
    79. “Central Lots Will Be Sold”. The Atlanta Constitution, April 6, 1903, p. 2. ↩︎
    80. “Big Real Estate Sale”. The Atlanta Journal, April 10, 1903, p. 14. ↩︎
    81. “Central Lots Bring High Figures”. The Atlanta Journal, April 21, 1903, p. 1. ↩︎
    82. “Edgewood Avenue Lots Bring Good Prices”. The Atlanta Journal, April 22, 1903, p. 4. ↩︎
    83. “Over Seven Acres Central Property At Auction Tuesday”. The Atlanta Journal, April 19, 1903, p. 9. ↩︎
    84. “Forrest and George Adair Edgewood Avenue Property For Sale” (advertisement). The Atlanta Journal, April 15, 1906, p. 4. ↩︎
    85. “Edgewood Avenue Property” (advertisement). The Atlanta Constitution, May 26, 1906, p. 12. ↩︎
    86. “Real Estate For Sale By Adair.” (advertisement) The Atlanta Constitution, June 3, 1906, p. 5. ↩︎
    87. “For Sale—Real Estate.” The Atlanta Journal, June 7, 1906, p. 14. ↩︎
    88. “Real Estate For Sale By Adair”. The Atlanta Constitution, June 10, 1906, p. 10. ↩︎
    89. “Forrest & George Adair—Auctioneers” (advertisement). The Atlanta Constitution, June 10, 1906, p. 8. ↩︎
    90. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1902) ↩︎
    91. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1900) ↩︎
    92. “Bankrupt Sale”. (advertisement) The Atlanta Journal, December 28, 1901, p. 11. ↩︎
    93. Legal notice. (advertisement)The Atlanta Journal, May 9, 1902, p. 11. ↩︎
    94. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1903) ↩︎
    95. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1904) ↩︎
    96. “Receiver’s Sale”. (advertisement) The Atlanta Journal, October 15, 1904, p. 13. ↩︎
    97. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1905) ↩︎
    98. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1906) ↩︎
    99. “For Sale—Miscellaneous” (advertisement). The Atlanta Journal, January 25, 1906, p. 17. ↩︎
    100. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1907) ↩︎
    101. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1908) ↩︎
    102. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1909) ↩︎
    103. “Miscellaneous” (advertisement).The Atlanta Journal, December 14, 1909, p. 18. ↩︎
    104. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1910) ↩︎
    105. “Miscellaneous” (advertisement).The Atlanta Journal, December 16, 1910, p. 21. ↩︎
    106. Atlanta City Directory Co’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1910) ↩︎
    107. “Building Permits.” The Atlanta Constitution, June 2, 1911, p. 15. ↩︎
    108. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1912) ↩︎
    109. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1913) ↩︎
    110. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1914) ↩︎
    111. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1915) ↩︎
    112. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1916) ↩︎
    113. “For Rent—Stores” (advertisement).The Atlanta Journal, October 1, 1917, p. 14. ↩︎
    114. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1918) ↩︎
    115. “Carpenter Shop.” (advertisement)The Atlanta Constitution, August 1, 1918, p. 11. ↩︎
    116. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1920) ↩︎
    117. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1921) ↩︎
    118. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1922) ↩︎
    119. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1923) ↩︎
    120. “Business Opportunities” (advertisement). The Atlanta Journal, May 23, 1924, p. 34. ↩︎
    121. “Shoots Woman And Then Kills Self In Atlanta Store”. The Atlanta Journal, August 7, 1924, p. 1. ↩︎
    122. “W.R.L. Morgan Fatally Wounds Woman He Loved”. The Atlanta Constitution, August 8, 1924, p. 1. ↩︎
    123. “Atlantian Shoots Woman to Death and Kills Himself”. The Atlanta Journal, August 9, 1924, p. 1. ↩︎
    124. “Funeral Services Today for Victims of Double Killing”. The Atlanta Constitution, August 9, 1924, p. 4. ↩︎
    125. “Hunt for Double Motive In Killing Dropped By Police”. The Atlanta Journal, August 8, 1924, p. 12. ↩︎
    126. “Funeral Services Today for Victims of Double Killing”. The Atlanta Constitution, August 9, 1924, p. 4. ↩︎
    127. ibid. ↩︎
    128. “Hunt for Double Motive In Killing Dropped By Police”. The Atlanta Journal, August 8, 1924, p. 12. ↩︎
    129. “H.L. Wilson, — Auctioneer” (advertisement). The Atlanta Constitution, May 13, 1888, p. 20. ↩︎
    130. “Is Atlanta Again to Open Doors to the Professional Gamblers Using Queer Cards and Dice?” The Atlanta Constitution, October 21, 1906, p. 1. ↩︎
    131. “Gaming House Is Raided By Police”. The Atlanta Journal, October 16, 1906, p. 1. ↩︎
    132. Police Plan to Ban All Minors From Pool Rooms”. The Atlanta Journal, July 2, 1916, p. 12. ↩︎
    133. “Gems Worth $1,500 Taken From Jeweler’s Home in Druid Hills”. The Atlanta Journal, September 3, 1924, p. 11. ↩︎
    134. “Burglars Reap Rich Harvest in Clothing; Tire Thieves Flourish”. The Atlanta Journal, March 13, 1925, p. 38. ↩︎
    135. “Atlanta Burglars Get Tough Breaks On Decatur Street”. The Atlanta Journal, September 19, 1928, p. 7. ↩︎
    136. “Radio Set Is Taken In Burglary at Home”. The Atlanta Journal, December 26, 1928, p. 16. ↩︎
    137. Bailey, Sharon. “GSU Baptist students have hopes to restore 1891 Victorian structure.” The Atlanta Journal, December 19, 1982, p. 43. ↩︎
    138. “Financial” (advertisement). The Atlanta Journal, October 18, 1925, p. F3. ↩︎
    139. “Small Boy Scalded By Boiling Water”. The Atlanta Constitution, November 26, 1925, p. 5. ↩︎
    140. “Boy, 2, Badly Scalded”. The Atlanta Journal, November 26, 1925, p. 2. ↩︎
    141. Advertisement. The Atlanta Journal, May 1, 1930, p. 4. ↩︎
    142. Advertisement. The Atlanta Journal, August 16, 1936, p. 41. ↩︎
    143. “Business Opportunities”. The Atlanta Constitution, April 7, 1935, p. 23. ↩︎
    144. “Sales of $70,959 for Adams-Cates”. The Atlanta Constitution, April 16, 1939, p. 12. ↩︎
    145. “Employment” (advertisement). The Atlanta Constitution, March 30, 1943, p. 18. ↩︎
    146. “Household Goods”. The Atlanta Journal, May 29, 1947, p. 26. ↩︎
    147. Shepard Decorators, Inc. advertisement. The Atlanta Journal, August 30, 1951, p. 33. ↩︎
    148. Brown Radio Service & Sales advertisement. The Atlanta Journal, October 29, 1952, p. 15. ↩︎
    149. Advertisement. The Atlanta Constitution, March 14, 1969, p. 14. ↩︎
    150. National Historic Landmark Nomination: Dixie Coca-Cola Bottling Company Plant ↩︎
    151. Bailey, Sharon. “GSU Baptist students have hopes to restore 1891 Victorian structure.” The Atlanta Journal and Constitution, December 19, 1982. ↩︎
    152. Patereau, Alan. “43 Georgia sites are in elite group.” The Atlanta Journal, August 25, 1987, p. 21. ↩︎
    153. Bailey, Sharon. “GSU Baptist students have hopes to restore 1891 Victorian structure.” The Atlanta Journal and Constitution, December 19, 1982. ↩︎
    154. Patereau, Alan. “43 Georgia sites are in elite group.” The Atlanta Journal, August 25, 1987, p. 21. ↩︎
    155. ibid. ↩︎
    156. ibid. ↩︎
    157. Bailey, Sharon. “GSU Baptist students have hopes to restore 1891 Victorian structure.” The Atlanta Journal and Constitution, December 19, 1982. ↩︎
    158. ibid. ↩︎
    159. ibid. ↩︎
    160. “Gov. Harris to dedicate new South Fulton chamber building in Union City”. The Atlanta Journal, August 16, 1984, South Fulton Extra, p. 1K. ↩︎
    161. Bailey, Sharon. “GSU Baptist students have hopes to restore 1891 Victorian structure.” The Atlanta Journal and Constitution, December 19, 1982. ↩︎
    162. National Historic Landmark Nomination: Dixie Coca-Cola Bottling Company Plant ↩︎
    163. Fox, Catherine. “Born-Again Buildings”. The Atlanta Journal, December 11, 1989, p. 27. ↩︎
    164. National Historic Landmark Nomination: Dixie Coca-Cola Bottling Company Plant ↩︎
    165. ibid. ↩︎
    166. National Historic Landmark Nomination: Dixie Coca-Cola Bottling Company Plant ↩︎
    167. Green, Josh. “1890s downtown ATL landmark up for grabs. Any big ideas?, Urbanize Atlanta. ↩︎
    168. About Us — BCM at Georgia State ↩︎
    169. 125 Edgewood – Atlanta – Property for Sale | PL | JLL ↩︎
    170. Auchmutey, Jim. “Staying the Wrecking Ball”. The Atlanta Journal, August 24, 1988, p. 1D. ↩︎

  • W.L. Glessner Residence (1890) – Americus, Georgia

    G.L. Norrman (attributed). W.L. Glessner Residence (1890). Americus, Georgia.
    G.L. Norrman (attributed). W.L. Glessner Residence (1890). Americus, Georgia.

    This picture gives me great joy.

    I just found a stash of old images that I had completely forgotten, including this one I took in 2017 of the W.L. Glessner Residence in Americus, Georgia.

    Planned as a seven-room cottage,1 this lovely two-story Queen Anne-style home is one of seven surviving buildings in Americus designed by G.L. Norrman. There isn’t historic documentation to prove it, but everything about the design indicates it’s his.

    The home was built between May and September 1890 for W.L. Glessner,2 editor of the Americus Recorder newspaper, who was the town’s most vocal booster while it was—briefly—one of the fastest-growing cities in the state.

    Glessner lived in the home for less than two years,3 leaving Americus in 1892,4 shortly after the town fell into economic collapse.

    I toured this house at least once when I was eight or nine years old, but I don’t remember much about the interior, except that it felt a little creepy and reeked of bat guano, which is true of most old buildings in Americus.

    By the early 1990s, the home had been abandoned and stripped of its original woodwork, mantels, and other interior elements, though it later underwent a meticulous restoration that incorporated salvaged pieces from local historic homes.

    The owners at the time reported discovering a “secret room,” apparently sealed off for years behind a wall—that certainly piqued my adolescent curiosity.

    I’ll revisit the design and history of this home at a later date.

    References

    1. “For Sale.” The Americus Daily Times-Recorder (Americus, Georgia), February 11, 1892, p. 6. ↩︎
    2. “Town Talk.” Americus Weekly Recorder (Americus, Georgia), May 2, 1890, p. 5. ↩︎
    3. “For Sale.” The Americus Daily Times-Recorder (Americus, Georgia), February 11, 1892, p. 6. ↩︎
    4. “Death of Mrs. L.E. Stone.” Americus Times-Recorder (Americus, Georgia), December 17, 1892, p. 1. ↩︎

  • C. D. Hurt Residence (1893) – Atlanta

    G.L. Norrman (attributed). C. D. Hurt Residence (1893). Inman Park, Atlanta.
    G.L. Norrman (attributed). C. D. Hurt Residence (1893). Inman Park, Atlanta.

    Hiding in plain sight in Atlanta’s Inman Park, the C. D. Hurt Residence isn’t conspicuous, and it doesn’t seem especially significant compared to the neighborhood’s showier mansions.

    Located at 36 Delta Place NE, this rambling two-story home is primarily Colonial Revival in style, with wood shingles, steep gables, an overhanging second floor, and an assortment of oddly shaped windows that recall the vernacular designs of coastal New England architecture.

    It’s good to have a little doubt when attributing buildings to architects, but in this case, there’s no need: the home can be indisputably credited to G.L. Norrman.

    Location of C.D. Hurt Residence

    Often erroneously dated to 1891 or 1892, the house was built in 1893, as reported in an April 1893 article in The Atlanta Constitution1 and another in May 1893 in The Atlanta Journal 2—both stated that the home was then in the course of construction.

    Dr. Charles D. Hurt (1843-19063) was the older brother of Joel Hurt, president of the East Atlanta Land Company, which initially owned and developed the Inman Park suburb.

    Norrman appears to have been Joel Hurt’s preferred architect at the time, completing as many as eight projects for his companies in the late 1880s and early 1890s, making him an obvious choice to design the home.

    G.L. Norrman (attributed). C. D. Hurt Residence (1893). Inman Park, Atlanta.
    G.L. Norrman (attributed). C. D. Hurt Residence (1893). Inman Park, Atlanta.

    The Design

    Beyond circumstantial evidence, the Hurt Residence can be handily attributed to Norrman based on specific elements that it shares with two homes designed by his firm in the same period: the R.O. Barksdale Residence (1893) in Washington, Georgia, which survives, and the Paul Romare Residence in Atlanta (1892, demolished).

    G.L. Norrman. R.O. Barksdale Residence (1893). Washington, Georgia.
    G.L. Norrman. R.O. Barksdale Residence (1893). Washington, Georgia.

    Similarities between the Hurt Residence and the Barksdale Residence:

    • The facades of both houses feature a prominent bay with two second-floor windows and a Palladian window on the first floor, both topped by a hip roof.
    • Both houses share the same chimney designs, slightly tapered at the top, with distinctive dentilled string courses.
    • Both houses originally featured a tall, exposed chimney on the front porch as a central focal point.
    • Both houses include porches with dentilled cornices and Norrman’s trademark Tuscan columns.
    G.L. Norrman. Paul Romare Residence (1893, demolished). Atlanta. Illustration by W.L. Stoddart.
    G.L. Norrman. Paul Romare Residence (1893, demolished). Atlanta. Illustration by W.L. Stoddart.

    Similarities between the Hurt Residence and the Romare Residence:

    • Both houses were topped with a steeply pitched hip roof.
    • Both houses included an oval window, also featured in Norrman’s design for the Thomas W. Latham Residence in Inman Park.
    • Both houses included an exposed chimney as a focal point, each embedded with the same classically styled niche (illustrated below)

    Similarities between the Hurt Residence and other Norrman projects:

    • The Hurt Residence’s shed dormer windows are of the same design as those on the Edward C. Peters Residence (1883) in Atlanta, a confirmed Norrman work, and the Atlanta & Edgewood Street Railway Shed (1889), also located in Inman Park and attributed to Norrman.
    • The Hurt Residence’s second-floor bay window is the same one used in the Atlanta & Edgewood Railway Shed, attributed to Norrman.
    G.L. Norrman. Chimney niche on the C. D. Hurt Residence.
    G.L. Norrman. Chimney niche on the C. D. Hurt Residence, Atlanta

    A Design Evolution

    While fairly unremarkable in appearance, the Hurt Residence represents a major shift in Norrman’s residential designs.

    In the 1880s and early 1890s, many of his larger home plans included a rear service wing that contained the kitchen and servants’ quarters—a prime example is the W.W. Duncan Residence in Spartanburg, South Carolina (1886, pictured below).

    The service wing was visually distinct from the main house and was often capped with a low-slung hip roof, denoting its modest, utilitarian status.

    G.L. Norrman. Service wing on the W.W. Duncan Residence (1886). Spartanburg, South Carolina.
    G.L. Norrman. Service wing on the W.W. Duncan Residence (1886). Spartanburg, South Carolina.

    For the Hurt Residence, the hip-roofed wing moved from the back to the front, the first time this appears to have been implemented in one of Norrman’s plans.

    That was a bold choice, marking Norrman’s initial departure from the lofty styles of the 1880s and early 1890s toward the less pretentious, more unassuming residential designs that took hold from the mid-1890s onwards.

    Norrman subsequently repeated and refined the Hurt design many times over the next several years. Prime examples are Atlanta’s W.L. Reynolds Residence (1897, pictured below) and the Leon D. Lewman Residence (1901, demolished, pictured below).

    Later versions made complete use of low-slung rooflines, but in the Hurt Residence, Norrman still designed an absurdly high central roof—a lingering remnant from his 1880s work.

    G.L. Norrman. W.L. Reynolds Residence (1897, altered). Midtown, Atlanta.
    G.L. Norrman. W.L. Reynolds Residence (1897, altered). Midtown, Atlanta.
    G.L. Norrman. Leon D. Lewman Residence (1901, demolished). Atlanta.
    G.L. Norrman. Leon D. Lewman Residence (1901, demolished). Atlanta.4

    The Hurt Residence’s 13-room floor plan also appears to have evolved from the plan used in Norrman’s design for the John T. Taylor Residence (1892) in Americus, Georgia.

    Based on a simple four-square grid, the plan for the Taylor Residence placed the stair hall in the lower left quadrant.

    In the Hurt Residence, the stair hall had to be pushed back to accommodate the projecting wing.

    Otherwise, the plans for the two houses are largely identical, right down to the separate exterior entrance in their first-floor bedrooms.

    Exterior entrance to the first-floor bedroom of the C.D. Hurt Residence, Atlanta
    Exterior entrance to the first-floor bedroom of the C.D. Hurt Residence, Atlanta

    A Question of Credit

    I suspect much of the Hurt Residence was designed by one or more of Norrman’s employees, possibly C. Walter Smith, Norrman’s longtime draughtsman and later chief assistant.

    Smith began working for Norrman in 1887, serving as a draughtsman for over five years before leaving to start his own practice in March 1893.5

    Within a year, Smith returned to Norrman’s firm to work as his chief assistant,6 but left to start his business again in April 1896,7 working independently until 1907.

    Based on his few surviving works, Smith wasn’t an exceptional designer in his own right: he clearly lacked whatever combination of ingredients made Norman such an outstanding architect.

    However, it appears that Norrman likely delegated many of his residential projects to Walter Smith in the 1890s.

    The Constitution all but said as much in 1896, when Smith embarked on his second solo attempt:

    “The work that he did even before he branched out for himself had gained for him a distinction that few people have won in a lifetime,” the newspaper noted. “Mr. Smith has designed and superintended the construction of many of the most elegant residences in the city…”8

    If you compare a typical Norrman residence from the 1880s to one from the 1890s, it’s clear that the latter projects didn’t receive nearly as much of his attention.

    Norrman’s career reached its commercial and creative peak between 1890 and 1893, and he increasingly spent much of his time traveling by train across the Southeastern United States, securing commissions and attending to building projects.

    With a packed schedule and an office full of assistants, Norrman likely began focusing most of his attention on large-scale or prestige commissions: the Windsor Hotel (1892) in Americus, Georgia, for instance, or the J.C. Simonds Residence (1893) in Charleston, South Carolina.

    G.L. Norrman. J.C. Simonds Residence (1893). Charleston, South Carolina.
    G.L. Norrman. J.C. Simonds Residence (1893). Charleston, South Carolina.

    Because Walter Smith left to form his practice while the Hurt Residence was under construction, it’s also possible that he started the project and another assistant completed it, which could explain the uneven design.

    W.L. Stoddart, for instance, was also employed by Norrman in 1893, still fresh from his training at Columbia University. When Norrman hired him in March 1892, the Journal claimed Stoddart would be his chief assistant,9 although he was listed as a draughtsman in city directories.10

    Every architect’s approach is different, but Norrman may have roughed out the preliminary plans for the project, leaving a draughtsman or assistant to fill in the details, while lending just enough of his finesse to claim the design as his own.

    The Hurt Residence’s north elevation also bears a striking resemblance to the side of the William Merritt Chase Homestead in New York, designed by McKim, Mead & White in 1892.

    Norrman frequently borrowed from the firm’s designs, and if he was pressed for time or lacking inspiration, he might have reproduced what he saw in a photograph or drawing of the home.

    North elevation of the C. D. Hurt Residence, Atlanta
    North elevation of the C. D. Hurt Residence, Atlanta

    A Messy Composition

    If Norrman didn’t give the Hurt Residence’s design much scrutiny, that might explain its frankly sloppy configuration: the three bay windows of different sizes on the north elevation, for example, or the hodgepodge of elements borrowed from other projects.

    Part of the home’s imbalance can be explained by its vernacular inspiration, but that doesn’t excuse its incoherent composition.

    Stand on one side of the Hurt Residence, and it looks like a completely different home from the other side. The design feels clunky, slapdash, and pure kitchen sink, as if everything but was thrown into it.

    Norrman also disliked the then-fashionable Colonial style, stating in 1890 that it had “at best, a number of absurdities”, and that “there are few who carry the style out well”.

    As a designer who excelled in the Romanesque and preferred the classical, Norrman may have been admitting to his own lack of proficiency in the style.

    Despite the Hurt Residence’s shortcomings, it’s entirely characteristic of Norrman’s 1893 residential designs, which stand out in his oeuvre as especially freewheeling and audacious. He was the most celebrated and sought-after architect in the Southeast at that point, and clearly felt emboldened to take risks.

    When the risk-taking worked, the results were spectacular, as seen in the Simonds Residence. When it didn’t? Well, you can see the results here.

    Shed dormer on the C.D. Hurt Residence, Atlanta
    Shed dormer on the C.D. Hurt Residence, Atlanta

    Construction and History

    The Hurt Residence’s history is as messy as its design, chock-full of the sort of macabre and pathetic tales one expects from an Atlanta home.

    A Whole Lotta Hurt

    C. D. Hurt (pictured here11) and his family moved to the city from Columbus, Georgia, in October 1892.12

    13 Until their own “elegant and roomy residence”14 was completed, the Hurts temporarily lived in the spec house at 56 Euclid Avenue15 (now 882 Euclid Avenue NE), which Norrman designed for the East Atlanta Land Company in 1890.

    While Hurt’s home was still being built in April 1893, it was also the site of a wedding for his niece, Lucy Hurt McTyere.16

    Hurt had five children with his wife, Mary, although it appears only his daughters, Louise and Maude, were living with them in 1893, when he was 50, and she was 46.

    Hurt worked as a medical surgeon and opened an office in Atlanta’s Equitable Building,17 which his brother owned. He was also on the payroll of his brother’s street railway company as a “medical advisor”—with whatever legitimate duties that must have entailed —in addition to being a staff member at Grady Memorial Hospital and the Atlanta School of Medicine.18 19

    There have been claims that Hurt operated his office from his home, but that appears to be inaccurate based on city directories and newspaper reports.

    Hurt’s daughter, Louise, married in January 1895, and the reception was held at the Hurt Residence.20 21 Assuming it was a happy occasion, the wedding was a singular bright spot preceding a long line of tragedies in the home:

    • On July 5, 1896, Hurt’s eight-month-old grandson, Charles, died in the home after a bout with malaria.22
    • On July 19, 1898, Hurt’s youngest daughter, Maude, died in the home at 6:45 p.m., following a 10-day illness.23 Only 17 years old, Maude’s death was described by the Constitution as “one of the saddest deaths that have clouded this city in years…”24
    • In September 1899, Charles and Joel Hurt’s brother, E.F. Hurt, died on an extended visit from New York, and his funeral was held in the Hurt Residence.25
    • Following a two-year illness, Mary Hurt died on October 22, 1902, “when death crept softly into the home,” according to the Journal. 26 27 Poetic, no?
    • Wasting little time, C.D. Hurt married his second wife, Annie Louise Miller, in Hendersonville, North Carolina, on October 6, 1903. Annie was described as an “accomplished and attractive young woman,” 28 and the couple had an unnamed infant son when Hurt himself died in the home on August 12, 1906, following an eight-month illness.29 30

    After collecting on Hurt’s $15,000 life insurance policy,31 his accomplished and attractive young wife seemingly disappeared from Atlanta, and the home was presumably sold, ending the Hurts’ 13-year run of the house.

    Oval window on the east facade of the C.D. Hurt Residence, Atlanta
    Oval window on the east facade of the C.D. Hurt Residence, Atlanta

    Dwindling Fortunes

    With the United States emerging from a years-long financial depression at the turn of the 20th century, the ostentatious Inman Park residences designed by Norrman and other architects in the late 1880s and early 1890s were already relics of another era.

    Never the prestigious enclave Joel Hurt intended it to be, Inman Park had become thoroughly passe, and many of its first homes spent their early years either vacant or on the market—scan newspaper classified ads from the 1890s, and you’ll consistently find listings for “good as new” Inman Park homes for sale or rent, often at reduced prices.

    In the early 1900s, most of Atlanta’s prominent citizens continued to build their homes on Peachtree Street, two miles west of Inman Park, migrating further north toward Buckhead each year.

    Ansley Park quickly became a fashionable new residential section, largely because of its close proximity to Peachtree Street, but its homes were much more modest in appearance than the gaudy Gilded Age mansions of the previous century.

    The East Atlanta Land Company auctioned off Inman Park’s remaining lots en masse in 1904,32 and the neighborhood was filled out with mostly smaller, cheaper houses over the next decade.

    As the Journal noted in 1908: “The Inman Park of the present time…has almost forgotten the story of its origin—which now seems like ancient history…”33

    Second-floor bay window on the north elevation of the C.D. Hurt Residence, Atlanta
    Second-floor bay window on the north elevation of the C.D. Hurt Residence, Atlanta

    Life As a Boarding House

    The large, antiquated Inman Park houses were really only viable as rental properties, so it’s no surprise that in December 1907, newspaper classifieds began requesting boarders for the former Hurt Residence. Terse but descriptive, the first ads touted: “Beautiful views, splendid board, country air, not far out.”34

    A January 1908 ad sought “Two or three young men for large front room; also couple for beautiful room,”35 while an October 1908 ad noted the home’s “Suite beautiful rooms, with private bath…”36

    In November 1908, ads described “Four connecting rooms, unfurnished…private entrance”,37 which likely referred to the home’s original master bedroom.

    In 1909, the entire house was listed for rent by Edwin P. Ansley‘s real estate agency for $50 a month.38

    On March 25, 1909, a 68 mph “hurricane” ripped across Atlanta, cutting a path from West End through Downtown to Inman Park. In a lengthy list of damaged buildings, the Journal reported that “In Inman Park at Edgewood avenue and Delta Place a chimney was blown down.”39

    This may have been the tall chimney at the front of the house, which was removed at some point in the structure’s history. A photograph from the 1970s shows that a chunk of one chimney stack was also missing, possibly a result of the same storm.

    Chimney and shed dormer on the C.D. Hurt Residence, Atlanta
    Chimney and shed dormer on the C.D. Hurt Residence, Atlanta

    In February 1910, the home was owned by C. Horace McCall when a “daring porch climber” broke the window of a second-floor bathroom.

    Mrs. Turner“, apparently a boarder in the house, screamed upon hearing the shattered window, scaring off the intruder. The Constitution noted ominously that “A dark shadow was seen in the distance…but no clews [sic] were obtained.”

    The report added: “This section of the city has been infested with burglars recently, and several citizens have made complaint of inadequate police protection.”40

    In July 1918, McCall and his wife still lived in the home when thieves robbed their backyard henhouse, swiping their entire collection, including 20 “frying-size chickens”. The stolen property totaled $30.41

    Mrs. McCall died in the house on February 28, 1923,42 and it appears the property was sold shortly thereafter. In July 1924, another infant died in the home: the son of two boarders, Mr. and Mrs. J.B. McMillam.

    Bay windows on the north elevation of the C.D. Hurt Residence
    Bay windows on the north elevation of the C.D. Hurt Residence, Atlanta

    By the 1920s, Atlanta had grown rapidly beyond Inman Park’s borders, and the former suburb was fully absorbed into the city.

    One mile northeast of the neighborhood, Druid Hills opened in 1908 (Norrman designed its first home), and many of Inman Park’s prominent residents—notably members of the Candler family— migrated to the outlying development for the next several years.

    As Inman Park fell into a decades-long decline, the old Hurt Residence passed through a succession of owners, always operating as a boarding house, and apparently attracting the caliber of people one associates with such establishments.

    A few incidents from those years are intriguing:

    • In 1925, the house was owned by the estate of the late John W. White when a 36-year-old boarder, Mrs. W.T. Hooks, was arrested for attempted arson. On May 4 of that year, fire crews were called to the home at 4 a.m., where they found a burning pile of kindling wood in Hooks’ closet, with Hooks “fully dressed and all her trunks completely packed”. The state accused Hooks of attempting to burn down the home for insurance money, but she was acquitted of the charges in June 1925.43 44 45 46 47
    • In 1929, a 31-year-old occupant of the home named T.M. Bates was treated at Grady Memorial Hospital for wounds received from a “vicious rat” that reportedly bit Bates twice as he was going to sleep, after which he “jumped on top of a dresser to escape further injury”.48
    • In January 1931, Fanny Jolly operated the boarding house when “the careless handling of an oil lamp” sparked a fire in the kitchen, forcing the home’s 11 occupants to “flee in their night clothing”. One boarder was knocked unconscious when he jumped 15 feet from his second-story window, while another received severe cuts on his legs from crawling out a different window.49 50

    In 1945, W.A. and Gertrude Croft bought the home from Harry Beerman.51 Real estate ads described the home as an “excellent rooming house” and “convenient to stores and cars”, concluding rather cynically that “This is a money-maker”.52

    This may have been when the home received its most significant alterations. In August 1946, classified ads from the address listed a “Monarch coal cook stove, gas cook stove…2 practically new glass paneled doors, 2 used windows” for sale.53

    Sounds like they were tearing up the place, doesn’t it?

    An image from the 1970s (pictured below) shows that at some point, the home’s front porch was partially filled in and screened, rooms were clumsily added to the porch roof, and original windows were moved and replaced. I suspect those alterations were the work of the Crofts.

    C.D. Hurt Residence, circa mid-1970s
    C.D. Hurt Residence, circa mid-1970s54

    It was also in the 1970s when Inman Park entered the nascent stages of a rebirth as young professionals began restoring its homes and joined forces to quash a proposed freeway that would have cut through the heart of the neighborhood.

    Inman Park had been notoriously run-down and crime-ridden for decades, though, and its transformation was hardly a foregone conclusion. Even as late as 1975, the Constitution claimed that “most people avoided” the area.55

    A skeptical article from 1971 described Inman Park as “a festering little carbuncle on the hide of big old Atlanta”, with residents detailing its precarious condition. One homeowner stated:

    “If you’ve got a sense of humor, it’s a great place to live. Over here, when people shoot guns they usually aim into the ceiling. There’s a lot of drug traffic in the neighborhood with the kids. They are very wise, like New York street children. I took one little girl to Grady while she was on a bad LSD trip. She was in the middle of the street screaming and everybody else was afraid to do anything. Hard drugs are apparently very available.”56

    Little wonder that the old Hurt Residence remained a target for crime—in January 1975, the home was burglarized again, with the thief swiping a tape recorder, clock, liquor, and 8 cartons of cigarettes.57

    In August 1976, a 47-year-old boarder at the address committed suicide in the most Atlanta way possible: jumping from the top of the Hyatt Regency atrium.58

    Palladian window on the C.D. Hurt Residence, Atlanta
    Palladian window on the C.D. Hurt Residence, Atlanta

    Return to Form

    In 1981, the home was listed for sale again and remained on the market for nearly two years under two different agencies.

    A succession of advertisements sounded increasingly desperate, first promoting the house as “Single family OR townhouse. Partially restored. Clean & livable” with “POOL & wine cellar”. 59 Later ads touted the home’s “suburban amenities.”60

    An ad for an open house breathlessly hyped: “13 Fireplaces, antique brass & beveled glass, arches, millwork & pocket doors!”61 Norrman always did like pocket doors.

    A May 1982 ad claimed that “Practical people will love the close-in convenient location and the fact that it can be used for rental units.”62

    That was oddly out of step with the changing character of the neighborhood, however—it wasn’t practical people who were buying in Inman Park at that point, but those invested in its resurgent vision.

    Chimney on the C.D. Hurt Residence, Atlanta
    Chimney on the C.D. Hurt Residence, Atlanta

    By the 1990s, Inman Park had completed a dramatic revitalization that drew national acclaim, and the Hurt Residence finally returned to its intended use as a private dwelling.

    The home has been fully renovated, with the mid-20th-century accretions on the front removed and the porch and facade restored to a reasonable facsimile of their original appearance.

    Inman Park is now one of the most exclusive and desirable neighborhoods in intown Atlanta, with homes like the Hurt Residence valued in the millions. More than a century after its conception, Joel Hurt’s development is finally a success.

    And as for his brother’s home—well, it’s more significant than it initially seems.

    C.D. Hurt Residence, Atlanta
    C.D. Hurt Residence, Atlanta

    References

    1. “City Notes.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 2, 1893, p. 23. ↩︎
    2. “Flowers Are A-Blooming.” The Atlanta Journal, May 5, 1893, p. 3. ↩︎
    3. “Dr. C.D. Hurt Dead: Ill 8 Months”. The Atlanta Journal, August 13, 1906, p. 5. ↩︎
    4. “New Lewman Residence On Peachtree Place.” The Atlanta Constitution, October 6, 1901, p. 5. ↩︎
    5. “A Card”. The Atlanta Constitution, March 1, 1893, p. 10. ↩︎
    6. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1894) ↩︎
    7. “Out For Himself.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 19, 1896, p. 20. ↩︎
    8. ibid. ↩︎
    9. “A Trifle Gossipy.” The Atlanta Journal, March 25, 1892, p. 1. ↩︎
    10. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1893) ↩︎
    11. Photo credit: Marr, Christine V. and Sharon Foster Jones. Inman Park. Arcadia Publishing: Charleston, South Carolina, 2008, p. 49. ↩︎
    12. “Personal Mention.” The Atlanta Journal, September 12, 1892, p. 1. ↩︎
    13. “Senator Gordon.” The Atlanta Journal, September 24, 1892, p. 1. ↩︎
    14. “Flowers Are A-Blooming.” The Atlanta Journal, May 5, 1893, p. 3. ↩︎
    15. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1893) ↩︎
    16. “Society”. The Atlanta Journal, April 19, 1893, p. 2. ↩︎
    17. Atlanta City Directory Co.’s Greater Atlanta (Georgia) city directory (1893) ↩︎
    18. “Dr. Chas. Hurt Yields to Death”. The Atlanta Constitution, August 13, 1906, p. 1. ↩︎
    19. “Dr. C.D. Hurt Dead: Ill 8 Months”. The Atlanta Journal, August 13, 1906, p. 5. ↩︎
    20. “Carlton-Hurt” The Atlanta Constitution, February 15, 1895, p. 3. ↩︎
    21. “Today’s Talk in Society”. The Atlanta Journal, January 23, 1895, p. 7. ↩︎
    22. “Little Child’s Death.” The Atlanta Journal, July 6, 1897, p. 5. ↩︎
    23. “Death of Miss Hurt.” The Atlanta Constitution. July 20, 1898, p. 55. ↩︎
    24. “In Memory of Miss Mary Maude Hurt.” The Atlanta Constitution, July 24, 1898, p. 15. ↩︎
    25. “Death Has Come to Mr. E.F. Hurt”. The Atlanta Journal, September 18, 1899, p. 3. ↩︎
    26. “Mrs. Mary Hurt Is Dead After Years of Illness”. The Atlanta Journal, October 23, 1902, p. 7. ↩︎
    27. “Miss Mary Hurt Is Dead After Long Illness”. The Atlanta Journal, October 22, 1902, p. 8. ↩︎
    28. “Miss Miller of N.C. Weds Dr. C.D. Hurt.” The Atlanta Journal, October 6, 1903, p. 10. ↩︎
    29. “Dr. Chas. Hurt Yields to Death”. The Atlanta Constitution, August 13, 1906, p. 1. ↩︎
    30. “Dr. C.D. Hurt Dead; Ill 8 Months”. The Atlanta Journal, August 13, 1906, p. 5. ↩︎
    31. “Wil [sic] of Dr. Hurt Has Been Probated”. The Atlanta Journal, August 16, 1906, p. 5. ↩︎
    32. “Big Auction Sale May 31.” The Atlanta Constitution, May 22, 1904, p. 8. ↩︎
    33. “Inman Park, Atlanta’s First Suburb, Has Developed Into One of the City’s Most Beautiful Resident Sections”. The Atlanta Journal, April 26, 1908, p. H5. ↩︎
    34. “Wanted–Boarders.” The Atlanta Constitution, December 8, 1907, p. 3D. ↩︎
    35. “Wanted–Boarders.” The Atlanta Constitution, January 5, 1908, p. 4. ↩︎
    36. “Wanted–Boarders.” The Atlanta Constitution, October 1, 1908, p. 10. ↩︎
    37. “For Rent–Rooms”. The Atlanta Journal, November 8, 1908, p. H9. ↩︎
    38. “For Rent by Edwin P. Ansley”. The Atlanta Constitution, March 14, 1909, p. 3. ↩︎
    39. “Scenes of Havoc Wrought By Last Night’s Wind”. The Atlanta Journal, March 25, 1909, p. 1. ↩︎
    40. “Burglar Visits Inman Park Home”. The Atlanta Constitution, February 7, 1910, p. 7. ↩︎
    41. “C.H. McCall’s Chickens Are Taken By Thieves”. The Atlanta Journal, July 2, 1918, p. 12. ↩︎
    42. “Mortuary”. The Atlanta Constitution, March 1, 1923, p. 24. ↩︎
    43. “Woman Is Indicted On Arson Charges After Fire in Atlanta”. The Atlanta Journal, June 5, 1925, p. 36. ↩︎
    44. “Arson Is Charged To Mrs. W.T. Hooks In Indictment”. The Atlanta Constitution, June 6, 1925, p. 7. ↩︎
    45. “Woman’s Trial Begins In Superior Court On Charge of Arson.” The Atlanta Journal, June 25, 1925, p. 5. ↩︎
    46. “Woman Is Freed On Arson Charge In Fulton Court”. The Atlanta Constitution, June 26, 1925, p. 3. ↩︎
    47. “Woman Is Acquitted On Charge of Setting Fire to House Here”. The Atlanta Journal, June 26, 1925, p. 20. ↩︎
    48. “Atlantian Scales Dresser To Escape Vicious Rat”. The Atlanta Journal, September 9, 1929, p. 4. ↩︎
    49. “11 Persons Escape, Two Are Injured As House Burns”. The Atlanta Journal, January 7, 1931, p. 14. ↩︎
    50. “Two Injured in Fire, Eleven Flee Building”. The Atlanta Constitution, January 8, 1931, p. 6. ↩︎
    51. “Adams-Cates Reports $62,600 August Sales”. The Atlanta Journal, August 12, 1945, p. 7-D. ↩︎
    52. “Homes for Sale, N.E.” The Atlanta Constitution, May 18, 1945, p. 23. ↩︎
    53. “Household Goods”. The Atlanta Constitution, August 24, 1946, p. 6. ↩︎
    54. Photo credit: Marr, Christine V. and Sharon Foster Jones. Inman Park. Arcadia Publishing: Charleston, South Carolina, 2008, p. 49. ↩︎
    55. Tyson, Jean. “Rebirth: Old Neighborhoods Come Alive Again”. The Atlanta Journal and Constitution, April 20, 1975, p. 1-G. ↩︎
    56. Sparks, Andrew. “Turmoil Among the Turrets”. The Atlanta Journal and Constitution Magazine, March 7, 1971, p. 25. ↩︎
    57. “Crime Report”. The Atlanta Constitution, January 3, 1975, p. 4-C. ↩︎
    58. “Two Persons Leap to Deaths Here”. The Atlanta Constitution, August 22, 1976, p. 6-A. ↩︎
    59. “Bud Bailey Realty”. The Atlanta Constitution, April 29, 1981, Classified p. 12. ↩︎
    60. “Downtown Properties”. The Atlanta Constitution, April 4, 1982, Classified p. 16. ↩︎
    61. “Open House”. The Atlanta Journal, October 17, 1982, p. 30-J. ↩︎
    62. “Downtown Properties”. The Atlanta Journal, May 2, 1982, Classified p. 17. ↩︎

  • Denmark Hall (1902) – Athens, Georgia

    G.L. Norrman. Denmark Hall (1902). University of Georgia, Athens.
    G.L. Norrman. Denmark Hall (1902). University of Georgia, Athens.

    One of G.L. Norrmans least interesting works, Denmark Hall at the University of Georgia in Athens, has always been something of a bastard stepchild.

    Tucked in a dark corner of the campus near South Lumpkin Street, the structure was designed primarily as a dining hall containing two adjoining 1,296-square-foot dining rooms and initially accommodated 144 students.1

    The structure was built concurrently with nearby Candler Hall and was named for B.A. Denmark of Savannah2, a University of Georgia alumnus and the chairman of the building committee for the university’s Board of Trustees, who died in June 1901, just weeks after approving Norrman’s plans,3 and one day before the building’s cornerstone ceremony.4

    Location of Denmark Hall

    Denmark had secured $45,000 from the Georgia legislature to fund the 2 buildings,5 but one of Norrman’s original plans called for combining the dining hall and dormitory into one structure—the committee rejected that proposal.6

    Candler Hall subsequently received the bulk of the funding— $28,0007—and most of Norrman’s attention, it seems. Denmark Hall was reportedly built for less than half that amount: $12,850.8

    Norrman’s plans were selected in open competition against a fairly meager crop of designers: J.W. GoLucke of Atlanta, Hodgson & Company of Athens, Georgia; E.C. Seiz of Atlanta; D.A. Myer of Williamsport, Pennsylvania; Alexander Blair of Macon, Georgia; and Walter & Legare of Columbia, South Carolina.9

    It also no doubt helped that Norrman and B.A. Denmark had a history together: Denmark was a longtime member of Savannah’s local Board of Public Education, and approved Norrman’s plans for the Anderson Street School (1896),10 and presumably, the 38th Street School (1901).11

    The Design

    G.L. Norrman. Projected design of Denmark Hall (1901). University of Georgia, Athens.
    G.L. Norrman. Projected design of Denmark Hall, Athens, Georgia.12

    Low-slung and utilitarian, Denmark Hall was designed with a central 2-story structure that originally housed the dining rooms, flanked by a large one-story kitchen at the back and a small one-story wing at the front, containing a sitting room, lounge, and small recessed entry porch. Storage rooms were located in the basement.13

    The second floor included the “matron’s room”—living quarters for the dining hall manager—and “three other rooms for the use of students who may be sick enough to need such care and attention as they can be given there”, according to the Atlanta Constitution.14 A spacious recessed porch spanned the front of the second floor.

    The exterior of the building was clad in stucco-covered brick scored to resemble stone and given Neoclassical touches.

    Intact original elements include:

    • A simple Tuscan cornice around the main structure
    • A plain string course at the base of the building
    • A composite cornice on the front wing
    • Smooth pilasters on the front wing
    • Mullioned windows on the front wing
    • 4 chimneys

    Original elements that have been removed include:

    • The second-floor porch
    • 7 Doric columns
      • 2 decorative columns framing the entry
      • 5 supporting columns spaced across the second-floor porch
    • A balustrade lining the roof of the front wing
    • Dormer windows on the front and sides

    Denmark Hall’s facade evolved from Norrman’s design for the Arthur B.M. Gibbes Residence in Savannah, Georgia, built in 1900.15 The Gibbes home is one of the most atrocious designs Norrman ever put his name to, and Denmark Hall wasn’t much better.

    G.L. Norrman. Arthur B.M. Gibbes House (1900). Savannah, Georgia.
    G.L. Norrman. Arthur B.M. Gibbes Residence (1900). Savannah, Georgia.

    By the turn of the 20th century, Norrman had all but abandoned the brash, soaring lines and elements of his earlier designs: the lofty towers, fantastically high roofs, oversized porches and gables, and prominent chimneys.

    The transition was partly due to changing tastes, but also reflected a severely depressed economy and Norrman’s own dwindling fortunes.

    Looking at his projects circa 1897-1900, it’s clear that Norrman had lost confidence, inspiration, and interest: his designs from the time were often sluggish and banal, many of them poor rehashes of his earlier, more successful works.

    The Gibbes Residence was one such project, a clunky reiteration of his design for the Milton Dargan Residence in Atlanta.

    For Denmark Hall, Norrman took the template for the Dargan and Gibbes facades and stretched it out. The entry porch from those designs remained, but the Palladian windows on either side were replaced with simpler windows.

    The small recessed porch from the previous plans was expanded across the second floor, and the two large dormer windows from the Dargan house were shrunk to fit the building’s reduced height.

    Norrman was a master of working with solids and voids in his compositions, and in his design for Denmark Hall, you can easily spot his technique.

    It was as if he had removed a block of space from the second floor and placed it at the foot of the building, creating both the upper porch and the lower front wing—a simple but effective trick to achieve visual balance.

    The building’s overall composition would have been stronger if it had remained faithful to the design shown in the original rendering (above), which included a higher roofline.

    Why Norrman altered the roof to a lower pitch is unclear, but a vintage photograph of the building (pictured below) shows that the large porch columns and wide chimneys depicted in the illustration were substituted with thinner versions to accommodate the altered design, robbing the composition of much-needed vigor.

    Breaking with classical precedent, the odd number of columns across the front was an unconventional choice, and a subtle indicator of the building’s role as a modern facility for the 20th century.

    Photograph of Denmark Hall from an undated postcard.
    Photograph of Denmark Hall from an undated postcard.16

    Construction and History

    Construction on Denmark Hall began circa May 1901,17 using convict labor loaned by Clarke County.18

    There was a report from June 1901 that the university’s Board of Trustees had concerns about the quality of the building materials used in Denmark Hall and Candler Hall, which the Atlanta Constitution remarked were “without weight, the architect demonstrating to the satisfaction of the board that the material was all right.”19

    Denmark Hall’s cornerstone was laid on June 14, 1901,20 and a July report from “Supt. McKinly” stated that work on both buildings was expected to be completed by late October.21

    Denmark and Candler Halls ultimately opened on January 7, 1902. With delays blamed on weather and the holidays, construction on the buildings ran to the last minute, and their completion delayed the start of the school semester by four days.22

    In Denmark Hall’s first year of operation, students were charged a whopping $7.50 to $8 a month for meals.23

    The original “matron” of the facility was Mrs. B.H. Kinnebrew.24 She resigned in March 1908,25 after her husband, a sheriff’s deputy, shot and killed himself with a .44 caliber pistol “from no known cause” in their apartment on the building’s second floor.26 27

    By that time, students had already begun referring to Denmark Hall as “the Beanery”,28 an inglorious name that stuck with the structure for decades. By 1910, with the school’s halls overflowing, part of the second floor was converted to dormitory space,29 a function it served through at least the early 1920s.

    Interior of Denmark Hall, Athens, Georgia. Photograph from a postcard postmarked 1907.
    Interior of Denmark Hall, Athens, Georgia. Photograph from a postcard postmarked 1907.

    Norrman never seemed overly concerned with planning his structures for anticipated growth: he publicly railed against “waste space” and consistently designed his interiors to be as compact as possible while remaining functional.

    His design for Denmark Hall was no exception, and in November 1902, a newspaper report on the college’s record-breaking attendance stated that “every chair at the Denmark Dining Hall has been filled.”30

    By 1903, seating was increased to 160,31 and in 1908, the hall reportedly served 253 students, with the Board of Trustees asking the governor and legislature for “increased facilities at Denmark Hall.”32 In 1911, a report stated that the building was “taxed to its capacity”, requiring “enlargement and better equipment.”33

    Attendance at the school continued to grow, and despite repeated funding requests, Denmark Hall remained the only dining option on campus for more than 20 years.

    In 1914, the Athens Daily Herald reported that “the Beanery is crowded again this year”, adding, “we hope that the legislature will be able to make appropriations to enlarge the dining hall.”34

    In 1921, the Athens Daily Banner lamented: “Not only is the dining room crowded but the matter of cooking for 350 people in a kitchen equipped for two-thirds that number and not well equipped at that is taxing Mrs. Kennebrew’s [sic]most skillful management.”35 Apparently, Mrs. Kinnebrew returned.

    Finally, with the opening of Memorial Hall in June 1924, the campus gained additional dining space,36 although Denmark Hall remained the primary facility for that purpose.

    1936 addition to Denmark Hall, Athens, Georgia
    1936 addition to Denmark Hall, Athens, Georgia

    In 1936, Denmark Hall received its first expansion: a small cafeteria seating 92 students.37 38The cafeteria wing was attached to the southwest corner of the building,39 and its exterior appearance is remarkably congruent with Norrman’s design. The basement was also remodeled during the expansion.40

    The cafeteria plan quickly gained popularity, and in 1938, Denmark Hall became the first dining space on campus to switch entirely to the cafeteria system,41 ending the era of “food served in the old manner”, which required the employment of waiters.42

    In 1939, Mrs. M.D. Dunlap became the new director and dietitian of Denmark Hall,43 44 and she and her husband, a professor, took up residence on the second floor. At some point in their residency, Professor Dunlap began a garden on the roof of the front wing.45

    In 1942 and 1943, Denmark Hall received multiple additions to accommodate the feeding of 1,200 Signal Corps troops who trained on the University of Georgia campus in preparation for World War II.46 47 48

    The first expansion was an annex hastily added to the kitchen in 1942, expanding its size by a third.49 In 1943, four small additions were made to the building, including two screened porches.50 In September 1943, the Signal Corps school was closed,51 and the dining hall returned to student use.52 53

    With over $10,000 in improvements, the remodeled Denmark Hall was touted as “one of the most modern cafeterias on any campus in the South”,54 although that appears to have been hyperbole. In 1945, the university president reported to the Georgia General Assembly that the building was “outmoded and inadequate”. 55 56

    In 1948, after 10 years living on the second floor, Professor Dunlap moved to Atlanta, leaving his rooftop garden at Denmark Hall “wiltering”, according to one report.57 Seizing the opportunity, the college’s department of landscape architecture took over the building’s second floor, creating three draft rooms.58

    Since 1938, the landscape architecture department had been based at the Lumpkin House,59 60 a small antebellum residence that still stands on campus. With 75 students enrolled in the program,61 the new space in Denmark Hall was a much-needed addition to accommodate the department’s growth.

    East side of Denmark Hall, Athens, Georgia
    East side of Denmark Hall, Athens, Georgia

    In 1955, a popular student hangout spot called the Co-Op moved to Denmark Hall’s basement, where it included a soda fountain, snack bar, grill, and a supply store. For the Co-Op’s occupation of the space, the basement was air-conditioned and refinished in knotty pine.62 63

    The rest of the building, however, was not air-conditioned and was reportedly “in bad shape”. In 1952, an inspection committee identified Denmark Hall as one of several buildings “in need of extensive repairs.”64

    First-hand accounts of the Beanery at the time were unpleasant: students described it as “drab old Denmark Hall”,65 where “…to find your food during the warm months, you have to push literally dozens of flies from your plate.”66 Savory.

    With the opening of a new cafeteria in nearby Memorial Hall, the last meal at Denmark Hall was served on March 14, 1956, ending 55 years of continuous food service.67 68

    The university had previously announced its plans to demolish Denmark Hall,69 70 but the building was instead spared and received an extensive $40,000 overhaul for use as the landscape architecture department’s new home.71 72

    Looking at Denmark Hall from the northwest
    Looking at Denmark Hall from the northwest

    Primarily designed by E.C. Weren, a member of the landscape architecture faculty, Denmark Hall’s renovation was not sympathetic to Norrman’s original design.

    The renovation included the demolition of most of the original kitchen, a complete overhaul of the interior, enclosure of the second-floor porch, an outdoor stairwell tacked on to the west side of the building, air conditioning, and “extensive use of screen walls and glass.”73

    This also appears to be when Denmark Hall’s columns, dormers, and balustrade were removed from the exterior, as they were still present in a photograph from 1951.74

    The renovated building officially reopened on October 16, 1957.75

    The Co-Op remained in the basement during Denmark Hall’s renovation and was expanded,76 77 78 but in 1963, it was unceremoniously shuttered for full occupation by the landscape architecture department.79

    On October 6, 1964, the building officially reopened again, with the basement now housing a model shop, blueprint room, darkroom, drafting room, and 2 classrooms. The basement renovation reportedly cost $100,000, more than twice the amount spent on the entire building 7 years earlier.80

    Rear of Denmark Hall with screen walls from the 1957 renovation
    Rear of Denmark Hall with screen walls from the 1957 renovation

    Denmark Hall’s 1964 renovation was its last substantial alteration, although it has received piecemeal alterations and upgrades for decades. As of 2025, the building remains in use by the landscape architecture department’s successor, the College of Environment + Design.

    Essentially nothing of Denmark Hall’s original interior remains, but if you stand outside and squint your eyes, you can still make out the form of Norrman’s design.

    While Candler Hall received a beautiful renovation in 2003,81 the University of Georgia has shown little appetite to renovate its less-attractive sibling, which could still be accurately described as “drab old Denmark Hall.”

    The College of Environment + Design’s 2025 strategic plan included a vague goal to “renovate Denmark Hall as a cutting-edge teaching facility… funds permitting.”82

    That doesn’t sound very promising, does it?

    Gallery

    Dentilled cornice on the first-floor facade of Denmark Hall, Athens, Georgia
    Dentilled cornice on the facade of Denmark Hall, Athens, Georgia
    First-floor double window on the facade of Denmark Hall, Athens, Georgia
    First-floor double window on the facade of Denmark Hall, Athens, Georgia
    Keystone design and a window mullion on Denmark Hall, Athens, Georgia
    Keystone design and a window mullion on Denmark Hall, Athens, Georgia
    Cornice on the facade of Denmark Hall, Athens, Georgia
    Cornice on the facade of Denmark Hall, Athens, Georgia
    Pilaster and dentilled cornice on the facade of Denmark Hall, Athens, Georgia
    Pilaster and dentilled cornice on the facade of Denmark Hall, Athens, Georgia

    References

    1. “Plan of University Buildings Complete”. The Atlanta Constitution, April 24, 1901, p. 1. ↩︎
    2. “Named in Honor of B.A. Denmark.” The Athens Daily Banner, June 22, 1901, p. 3. ↩︎
    3. “Plans Accepted by the Trustees”. The Athens Daily Banner, April 13, 1901, p. 3. ↩︎
    4. “Profound Gloom on the Campus”. The Athens Daily Banner, June 14, 1901, p. 3. ↩︎
    5. The Twenty-Ninth Annual Report from the Department of Education to the General Assembly of the State of Georgia. Atlanta: The Franklin Printing and Publishing Company, 1901 ↩︎
    6. “To Discuss Buildings.” Savannah Morning News, April 12, 1901, p. 10. ↩︎
    7. “Plan of University Buildings Complete”. The Atlanta Constitution, April 24, 1901, p. 1. ↩︎
    8. “Denmark Hall.” The Red and Black, April 28, 1903, p. 2. ↩︎
    9. “Discussing New Plans For New Buildings.” The Athens Daily Banner (Athens, Georgia), March 2, 1901, p. 4. ↩︎
    10. “Norrman’s Plan Accepted.” The Morning News (Savannah, Georgia), February 11, 1896, p. 9. ↩︎
    11. “School Contract Awarded.” The Morning News (Savannah, Georgia), March 13, 1900, p. 8. ↩︎
    12. The Twenty-Ninth Annual Report from the Department of Education to the General Assembly of the State of Georgia. Atlanta: The Franklin Printing and Publishing Company, 1901 ↩︎
    13. “Plan of University Buildings Complete”. The Atlanta Constitution, April 24, 1901, p. 1. ↩︎
    14. ibid. ↩︎
    15. “Dwellings.” The Engineering Record, Volume 41, no. 12 (March 24, 1900), p. 287. ↩︎
    16. Doster, Gary L. A Postcard History of Athens, Georgia. Athens, Georgia: Athens Historical Society (2002). ↩︎
    17. “Notice to Contractors.” Athens Daily Banner, April 23, 1901, p. 3. ↩︎
    18. McManus, Rebecca, Alexandra Green, and Sophia Latz. Denmark Hall Historic Structure Report. ↩︎
    19. “Board of Trustees Make Full Report”. The Atlanta Constitution, June 17, 1901, p. 2. ↩︎
    20. “The Program for Today.” The Athens Daily Banner, June 14, 1901, p. 4. ↩︎
    21. “Work Resumed on Students Mess Hall.” The Weekly Banner (Athens, Georgia), July 19, 1901, p. 7. ↩︎
    22. “University Opens Again on Jan. 7.” The Weekly Banner (Athens, Georgia), January 3, 1902, p. 1. ↩︎
    23. “For Sons of Farmers”. The Oglethorpe Echo (Lexington, Georgia), November 22, 1901, p. 8. ↩︎
    24. “Mrs. Kinnebrew To Be In Charge”. The Weekly Banner (Athens, Georgia), September 13, 1901, p. 7. ↩︎
    25. “Editorial Notes”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), March 14, 1908, p. 2. ↩︎
    26. “Athens.” The Jackson Herald (Jefferson, Georgia), March 12, 1908, p. 4. ↩︎
    27. The Hartwell Sun (Hartwell, Georgia), March 13, 1908, p. 6. ↩︎
    28. “Editorial Notes”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), March 14, 1908, p. 2. ↩︎
    29. “Flames Broke Out In Denmark Hall”. The Athens Banner, April 9, 1910, p. 1. ↩︎
    30. “University Letter.” The Danielsville Monitor (Danielsville, Georgia), November 28, 1902, p. 2. ↩︎
    31. “Denmark Hall.” The Red and Black, April 28, 1903, p. 2. ↩︎
    32. “School Gets $75,000”. The Clayton Tribune (Clayton, Georgia), June 18, 1908, p. 1. ↩︎
    33. “A Large Equipment Necessary.” The Athens Banner, October 5, 1911, p. 4. ↩︎
    34. “Denmark Hall too Small”. The Athens Daily Herald. October 12, 1914, p. 5. ↩︎
    35. “Feeding Summer School Attend Ants Expertly”. The Athens Daily Banner, July 8, 1921, p. 5. ↩︎
    36. “Memorial Hall Is Dedicated Tuesday to Georgia’s Dead.” The Banner-Herald (Athens, Georgia), June 17, 1924, p. 1. ↩︎
    37. “Cafeteria Annex Opened at Denmark Dining Hall”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia). October 2, 1936, p. 10. ↩︎
    38. “Registration Reaches 2,815 for Fall Term To Break Old Mark”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), October 2, 1936, p. 1. ↩︎
    39. McManus, Rebecca, Alexandra Green, and Sophia Latz. Denmark Hall Historic Structure Report. ↩︎
    40. “Cafeteria Annex Opened at Denmark Dining Hall”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia). October 2, 1936, p. 10. ↩︎
    41. “Building Program Will Be Completed In About 60 Days”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), September 27, 1940, p. 19. ↩︎
    42. “Views Around Georgia”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), November 6, 1936, p. 4. ↩︎
    43. “House Mothers Add ‘Home Atmosphere’ In Joe Brown and Milledge Dormitories”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), September 29, 1939, p. 16. ↩︎
    44. “Cafeteria Is Seeking Home Atmosphere”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), September 29, 1939, p. 17. ↩︎
    45. Abney, George Jr. “Professor-Gardener Proves Drab Spaces Can Be Useful”. Athens Banner-Herald, September 22, 1948, p. 7. ↩︎
    46. “Denmark Hall Enlarged to Feed Armed Forces”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), March 6, 1942, p. 1. ↩︎
    47. “Additions Being Made to ‘Beanery’”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), July 9, 1943, p. 1. ↩︎
    48. Marshall, George. “Campus Construction Now Under Full Speed”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), July 31, 1942, p. 1. ↩︎
    49. “Denmark Hall Enlarged to Feed Armed Forces”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), March 6, 1942, p. 1. ↩︎
    50. “Additions Being Made to ‘Beanery’”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), July 9, 1943, p. 1. ↩︎
    51. “Signal Corps School Here Is To Be Closed September 24”. Athens Banner-Herald, July 11, 1943, p. 1. ↩︎
    52. “Denmark Hall Opens in Fall For Students”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), August 13, 1943, p. 1. ↩︎
    53. “Denmark Hall”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), August 13, 1943, p. 2. ↩︎
    54. “Denmark Hall Opens in Fall For Students”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), August 13, 1943, p. 1. ↩︎
    55. “$4,820,000 Appropriation Needed by University For Post-War Buildings”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), July 27, 1945, p. 1. ↩︎
    56. “A Step Forward”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), July 27, 1945, p. 2. ↩︎
    57. Abney, George Jr. “Professor-Gardener Proves Drab Spaces Can Be Useful”. Athens Banner-Herald, September 22, 1948, p. 7. ↩︎
    58. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), October 1, 1948, p. 8. ↩︎
    59. “Landscape Architecture Graduates Plan Departmental Homecoming Next Fall.” The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), May 27, 1938, p. 2. ↩︎
    60. “Alumni To Move To Lumpkin House”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), May 23, 1957, p. 3. ↩︎
    61. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), October 1, 1948, p. 8. ↩︎
    62. “Student Co-Op To Move Into Denmark Basement”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), October 21, 1954, p. 1. ↩︎
    63. “Co-Op To Move Monday Into Denmark Basement”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), January 7, 1955, p. 1. ↩︎
    64. “House Sub-Committee Reports On University Inspection Tour”, Athens Banner-Herald, January 21, 1952, p. 2. ↩︎
    65. Bradford, Bob. “Soup a la Fly”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), January 7, 1954, p. 4. ↩︎
    66. Branch, Roger. “Let’s Eat–Better”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), May 20, 1954, p. 4. ↩︎
    67. “Student Union Re-Opening Hailed By Early Christening Ceremonies”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), March 23, 1956, p. 1. ↩︎
    68. “Denmark Dining Hall Ends After 50 Years Service”. Athens Banner-Herald, March 13, 1956, p. 1. ↩︎
    69. “New Dining Hall Approved”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), December 12, 1952, p. 1. ↩︎
    70. “New Building Program To Include Arts Center”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), May 5, 1955, p. 11. ↩︎
    71. “Landscape Architecture Uses Old Colonial Home”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), March 8, 1956, p. 14. ↩︎
    72. “University Prepares Denmark for Landscape Architecture”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), October 12, 1956, p. 2. ↩︎
    73. “Open House Set Tomorrow At Landscape Architecture”. Athens Banner-Herald, October 15, 1957, p. 1. ↩︎
    74. “Red and Black Photographer Views Parking Situation”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), October 19, 1951, p. 1. ↩︎
    75. “Open House Set Tomorrow At Landscape Architecture”. Athens Banner-Herald, October 15, 1957, p. 1. ↩︎
    76. “Final Co-op Plans Receive Approval”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), February 28, 1957, p. 1. ↩︎
    77. “Old ‘Beanery’ Now Modern Campus Landscape Building”. Athens Banner-Herald, September 13, 1957, p. 1. ↩︎
    78. “Denmark Renovation To Expand Facilities For Crowded Co-Op”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), January 17, 1957, p. 1. ↩︎
    79. Taylor, Pat. “Old Co-Op Becomes A Victim of Growth”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), September 20, 1963, p. 1. ↩︎
    80. “Landscape Architecture Building Opens Oct. 6 With Formal Ceremonies”. Athens Banner-Herald, October 5, 1964, p. 1. ↩︎
    81. University of Georgia Historic Preservation Master Plan, October 2019 ↩︎
    82. University of Georgia College of Environment + Design 2025 Strategic Plan ↩︎

    Additional Reading

    1. “Bids for the New Buildings.” The Red and Black, February 2, 1901, p. 3.
    2. “Trustees Will Select Plans.” The Athens Daily Banner, March 1, 1901, p. 4.
    3. “Will Pass Upon the Plans”. The Atlanta Constitution, March 1, 1901, p. 2.
    4. “Discussing Plans for New Buildings.” The Athens Daily Banner, March 2, 1901, p. 4.
    5. “Dormitory and Mess Hall”. The Atlanta Constitution, March 2, 1901, p. 2.
    6. “Committee Accepts Plans”. The Atlanta Constitution, March 3, 1901, p. 4.
    7. ‘”Building Committee” Transact Important Business.’ The Red and Black, March 9, 1901, p. 1.
    8. “Plans for Buildings Were Discussed Today.” The Atlanta Journal, April 6, 1901, p. 5.
    9. “New Dormitory Plans Completed”. The Atlanta Journal, April 8, 1901, p. 5.
    10. “Board of Visitors Make Annual Report”. The Athens Banner, June 14, 1906, p. 9.
    11. “Increase”. Athens Banner, September 19, 1907, p. 1.
    12. “The University Needs Dormitories.” The Athens Banner, October 4, 1907, p. 4.
    13. “Coming Appropriation Bill”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), June 17, 1913, p. 8.
    14. “University of Georgia and Its Great Work”. The Athens Daily Herald. August 13, 1914, p. 10.
    15. “A Pressing Need”. The Athens Banner, September 19, 1916, p. 4.
    16. Drewry, John E. “Space Problem At University Acute”. The Athens Daily Banner, August 4, 1921, p. 5.
    17. “Stingy Legislature Helps Make University a School for Rich Men’s Sons Only”. The Banner-Herald (Athens, Georgia), October 3, 1923, p. 1.
    18. “Forecast Large Enrollment at the University”, The Athens Banner, September 17, 1921, p. 8.
    19. Many Women Will Attend University”. Athens Daily Herald, September 19, 1921, p. 5.
    20. Reynolds, Charles. “University Prepares for Start Of 136th Annual Session Sept. 17”. Athens Banner-Herald, August 30, 1936, p. 1.
    21. “What’s Rotten in Denmark”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), October 27, 1944, p. 4.
    22. “Letters to the editor”. The Red and Black (Athens, Georgia), October 27, 1944, p. 4.