Category: Northeastern United States

  • Cooper Branch Free Public Library (1918) – Camden, New Jersey

    Karcher & Smith. Cooper Branch Free Public Library (1918). Camden, New Jersey.
    Karcher & Smith. Cooper Branch Free Public Library (1918). Camden, New Jersey.1 2
    West elevation of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    West elevation of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    West elevation of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    West elevation of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Window on the facade of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Window on the facade of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Balustrade, inscription, and columns on the facade of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Balustrade, inscription, and columns on the facade of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Cornice, inscription, and Ionic capitals on the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Cornice, inscription, and Ionic capitals on the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Cornice, frieze, and pilasters on the southeast corner of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Cornice, frieze, and pilasters on the southeast corner of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Looking between columns at a window on the facade of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Looking between columns at a window on the facade of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Pedimented window on the facade of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Pedimented window on the facade of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Achitrave, ornamental railing, and triglyphs on a window of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Achitrave, ornamental railing, and triglyphs on a window of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Pediment and mouldings on the main entrance of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Pediment and mouldings on the main entrance of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Greek Key moulding on the facade of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Greek Key moulding on the facade of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Cornice, frieze, and pilasters on the northwest corner of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Pedestal, cornice, frieze, and pilasters on the north elevation of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Pedestal, cornice, frieze, and pilasters on the north elevation of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Date inscription, ornamental iron, and pediment above the main entrance of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Date inscription, ornamental iron, and pediment above the main entrance of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Ornamental iron and pediment above the main entrance of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Ornamental iron and pediment above the main entrance of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Second-floor window on the west elevation of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Second-floor window on the west elevation of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Base of a column on the facade of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Base of a column on the facade of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Light and pedestal at the entrance of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Light and pedestal at the entrance of the Cooper Branch Free Public Library, Camden, New Jersey
    Looking at the Cooper Branch Free Public Library from the southeast
    Looking at the Cooper Branch Free Public Library from the southeast

    References

    1. “Beautiful Design For New Library”. Camden Post-Telegram (Camden, New Jersey), April 20, 1916, p. 1. ↩︎
    2. “North Camden News”. Camden Post-Telegram (Camden, New Jersey), March 23, 1918, p. 9. ↩︎
  • Central Park Tower (2020) – New York

    Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill Architecture. Central Park Tower (2020). New York.
    Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill Architecture. Central Park Tower (2020). New York.1

    References

    1. Central Park Tower by Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill Architecture – Architizer ↩︎

  • City Hall (1901) – Philadelphia

    John McArthur, Jr., John Ord, and W. Bleydden Powell. City Hall (1901). Philadelphia.
    John McArthur, Jr., John Ord, and W. Bleydden Powell. City Hall (1901). Philadelphia.1 2 3 4 5 6

    References

    1. “The Public Buildings Commission In Session.” The Philadelphia Inquirer, September 16, 1870, p. 2. ↩︎
    2. “Proposals For The Erection Of Public Buildings.” The Daily Evening Telegraph (Philadelphia), November 5, 1870, p. 8. ↩︎
    3. “Architect Ord Explains”. The Philadelphia Times, February 1, 1894, p. 3. ↩︎
    4. “Grip’s Latest Victim”. The Philadelphia Inquirer, January 9, 1890, p. 2. ↩︎
    5. “Ord’s Successor”. The Philadelphia Inquirer, February 7, 1894, p. 1. ↩︎
    6. “The City Hall Changes Hands”. The Philadelphia Times, June 27, 1901, p. 3. ↩︎
  • Foggy Bottom-GWU Station (1976) – Washington, D.C.

    Harry Weese and Associates. Foggy Bottom-GWU Station (1976). Washington, D.C.
    Harry Weese and Associates. Foggy Bottom-GWU Station (1976). Washington, D.C.1 2

    References

    1. Here’s what the Metro could have looked like – Greater Greater Washington ↩︎
    2. Hines, William. “Washington’s Metro: 4.5 Miles In 5 Years”. St. Louis Post-Dispatch, June 24, 1975, p. 1D. ↩︎
  • Breuer in Brief

    Marcel Breuer and Hamilton P. Smith. Whitney Museum of Art (1966). New York.
    Marcel Breuer and Hamilton P. Smith. Whitney Museum of Art (1966). New York.

    A masterpiece of the Brutalist style, the Whitney Museum of Art (1966) in New York was designed by Marcel Breuer (1902-1981), an American modernist architect of the 20th century.

    Like so many architects of his era, Breuer’s legacy is being rapidly dismantled in the 21st century, with many of his projects already destroyed or now under threat of demolition.

    Born in Hungary to a Jewish family, Breuer (pronounced Broy-er) was both a student and teacher at the Bauhaus in Germany, where he became known for his cutting-edge furniture designs, most famously the Wassily chair.

    With the rise of the Nazi regime, Breuer moved to England in 1935, then immigrated to the United States in 1937 with his mentor, Walter Gropius, becoming a member of the influential Harvard Five group of architects.

    Between 1938 and 1941, Gropius and Breuer designed several residential projects together before Breuer broke off to start his own practice. One of their joint works is the Weizenblatt Duplex (1941) in Asheville, North Carolina, for which Breuer is credited as the primary designer.

    Walter Gropius and Marcel Breuer. Weizenblatt Duplex (1941). Asheville, North Carolina.
    Walter Gropius and Marcel Breuer. Weizenblatt Duplex (1941). Asheville, North Carolina.

    Breuer’s architectural career is neatly bifurcated into two distinct periods that couldn’t be less alike.

    In the 1940s and 50s, he was chiefly a small-scale designer who specialized in creating light, airy International-style residences that were much praised for their innovative floor plans and use of materials and building techniques.

    In the 1960s and 70s, Breuer abruptly switched gears and almost exclusively produced larger, more lucrative corporate and civic projects in the forceful, imposing Brutalist style, using concrete as his primary material.

    Marcel Breuer with Robert F. Gatje. Snower House (1954). Mission Hills, Kansas.
    Marcel Breuer with Robert F. Gatje. Snower House (1954). Mission Hills, Kansas.1

    A typical design of Breuer’s residential period, the Snower House (1954) is also one of his least-known projects, occupying a large corner lot in the Mission Hills suburb of Kansas City.

    The design is essentially a 1,800-square-foot rectangular box cantilevered on a concrete block base and was reportedly modeled after Breuer’s first home in New Canaan, Connecticut,2 although most of his houses from the era had a similar look.

    Breuer’s work was heavily concentrated in New England and the East Coast, and together with a house in Aspen, Colorado, the Snower House is one of only two completed residential projects he designed west of the Mississippi River3—he never even visited the property.4

    No one would say the Snower House is among Breuer’s more distinct works, but it still has all the hallmarks of his early residential designs. Notably, the home utilizes Breuer’s “bi-nuclear” floor plan, with living spaces placed on one side and sleeping areas on the other.

    South elevation of Snower House, Mission Hills, Kansas
    South elevation of Snower House, Mission Hills, Kansas

    You can also clearly identify Breuer’s attention to form and creative use of materials: large windows on every side of the home blur the boundary between exterior and interior, tiny windows punctuate walls patterned with cedar strips, and brightly colored asbestos panels add much-needed visual contrast.

    The home has remained remarkably true to its initial design and, at the time of a 2015 news report, had retained many of its original furnishings, including living and dining furniture designed or specified by Breuer, kitchen cabinets, and a built-in bookcase in the living room.5

    As of 2015, the interior still featured the original cedar-plank ceilings and walnut flooring, and the owners had restored the original orange, blue, and gold color scheme.6

    North elevation of Snower House, Mission Hills, Kansas
    North elevation of Snower House, Mission Hills, Kansas

    The Snower House was built as a country residence, but is now surrounded by a sprawling maze of cookie-cutter homes. The structure spends most of the year obscured by leafy trees, and with its cantilevered design, it almost appears to float among the greenery.

    It’s a home that takes a certain amount of architectural knowledge to appreciate: while groundbreaking when it was constructed, today an uninformed observer could easily misjudge it as a holdover from a high-end trailer park.

    Trapezoidal window detail on the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Trapezoidal window on the Whitney Museum of Art, New York

    Twelve years after the Snower house was built, Breuer’s design for the Whitney Museum of Art was completed at 945 Madison Avenue in New York’s Upper East Side.

    Anyone unfamiliar with Breuer’s work would never guess the two projects were by the same architect, but look closely, and you’ll note that both buildings give the same impression of floating and show the same attention to form and materials.

    Looking something like an inverted ziggurat, the seven-story, 76,830 square foot structure—now also referred to as the Breuer Building—was designed by Breuer with his longtime associate Hamilton P. Smith.

    Board-formed concrete on the south elevation of the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Board-formed concrete on the south elevation of the Whitney Museum of Art, New York

    The building’s exterior is defined by cantilevered floors that progressively extend toward the street, covered in dark granite tiles over reinforced concrete. The ground-floor entrance is set back from the street and accessed by a bridge spanning a moat-like sunken courtyard.

    The Whitney’s facade presents a nearly blank face to Madison Avenue, apart from a large trapezoidal window, which became one of Breuer’s signature elements.

    The north side of the building, facing East 75th Street, is punctuated by six smaller windows, similar to Breuer’s use of tiny windows in the Snower residence.

    Lights in the lobby of the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Lights in the lobby of the Whitney Museum of Art, New York

    The building’s interior showcases Breuer’s masterful blending of textures and patterns, particularly in the lobby and stairwells.

    Smooth, concave dome lights in the lobby contrast with the dark ceiling and roughly textured walls, made of vertical board-formed concrete. Floors throughout the building are covered in bluestone slab tile, and the walls in the stairwells are formed with bush-hammered concrete.

    Sleek bronze railing on the stairs recalls Breuer’s earlier furniture designs, and the abundance of built-in seating thoughtfully incorporated throughout the building is an obvious byproduct of his residential period.

    Stairwell in the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Stairwell in the Whitney Museum of Art, New York

    I visited 945 Madison in January 2024, when the building was about to end its three-year run as the temporary home of the Frick Collection.

    Visiting the Frick was a grim and joyless experience, and, for whatever reason, the museum’s management prohibited photography in the galleries—it’s not like any of their boring old art was worth a picture. I dodged the leering security guards and snapped a photo anyway, because fuck that Nazi nonsense.

    The Frick had also covered Breuer’s signature windows with giant scrims, so there wasn’t much to admire in the building’s galleries. In the image below, you can still see some of the coffered ceilings, bluestone tiles, and built-in seating.

    I took a picture in the gallery. Sue me.
    I took a picture in the gallery. Sue me.

    Breuer’s creative output arguably peaked with the Whitney and became increasingly repetitive and self-referential through the late 1960s.

    In 1968, the same year he was awarded the Gold Medal of the American Institute of Architects, Breuer also faced severe backlash for his proposed Grand Central Tower, which called for the demolition of New York’s landmark train station, only a few years after the destruction of the original Penn Station ignited widespread protest.

    New Yorkers aren’t known for forgiveness, and at Breuer’s death, Paul Goldberger, then the architecture critic for The New York Times, wrote in his obituary for Breuer that the architect was “most likely to be remembered for things that are very small—things that are not buildings at all.”7 Meow.

    His prediction wasn’t wrong, though, as Breuer’s contributions to architecture are all but forgotten today. And why is that?

    Marcel Breuer and Herbert Beckhard. Department of Housing and Urban Development (1968). Washington, D.C.
    Marcel Breuer and Herbert Beckhard. Department of Housing and Urban Development (1968). Washington, D.C.

    Societal taste in architecture is always fickle, but the backlash against Brutalism has been especially swift and severe. What was initially embraced in the 1960s as a universal, egalitarian, and essentially optimistic style was, by the 21st century, widely viewed as hostile, oppressive, and just plain ugly.

    It doesn’t help that concrete ages poorly: it cracks, it stains, and if it isn’t regularly power-washed (and it never is), it just looks drab and dirty. Slapping white paint on old concrete buildings has become popular in recent years, but it’s a cheap trick that never works.

    Breuer’s output was also wildly inconsistent in the second half of his career. While he had a few outstanding gems like the Whitney, his firm also produced many banal and uninspired projects in the 1960s and 70s, with a clear prioritization of commissions over creativity.

    Thus, Breuer’s name is associated with such dreary designs as the Department of Housing and Urban Development (1968) in Washington, D.C., or the downright hideous building for the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (1977) in the same city.

    Later projects like the Strom Thurmond Office Building and Federal Courthouse (1979) in Columbia, South Carolina, shouldn’t even be mentioned in the same breath as Breuer, since he obviously had nothing to do with their design.

    Breuer’s disappearance from public consciousness is hardly unique: most people today would be completely unfamiliar with his contemporaries, like Philip Johnson, Louis Kahn, Paul Rudolph, or I.M. Pei. The average person’s assessment of any of those designers’ best work would likely be unfavorable as well.

    Marcel Breuer and Hamilton P. Smith. Detail of Strom Thurmond Office Building and Federal Courthouse (1979). Columbia, South Carolina.
    Marcel Breuer and Hamilton P. Smith. Strom Thurmond Office Building and Federal Courthouse (1979). Columbia, South Carolina.

    However, Breuer is still a favorite of architectural historians and preservationists, and many were outraged when Breuer’s first binuclear residential design was demolished in January 2022 to make way for a tennis court.

    At the same time, Breuer’s own summer home (1949) in Wellfleet, Massachusetts, was also threatened with demolition but was spared after it was purchased by a local historic trust.

    In June 2025, the Department of Housing and Urban Development announced the departure from its Breuer-designed facility, and the future of that complex—which lacks historic protections—is anyone’s guess.

    Some of Breuer’s projects have found new uses: in 2003, part of Breuer’s landmark design for the Armstrong Rubber Company (1966) in New Haven, Connecticut, was demolished to make way for an IKEA store, but the remaining portion of the structure has since been converted to a boutique hotel.

    Atlanta’s Central Library (1980) was the last project credited to Breuer, and it too faced possible destruction until it was spared by a controversial renovation completed in 2021.

    Gallery

    Trapezoidal window on the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Trapezoidal window on the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Trapezoidal windows on the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Trapezoidal windows on the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Trapezoidal window on the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Trapezoidal window on the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Lobby of the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Lobby of the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Stairwell in the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Stairwell in the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Looking up from the lower level of the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Looking up from the lower level of the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Looking at the street from the stairwell in the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Looking at the street from the stairwell in the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Looking up from the lower level of the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Looking up from the lower level of the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Trapezoidal window on the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Trapezoidal window on the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Trapezoidal window on the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Trapezoidal window on the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Fifth-floor trapezoidal window on the Whitney Museum of Art, New York
    Fifth-floor trapezoidal window on the Whitney Museum of Art, New York

    References

    1. McCarter, Robert. Breuer. New York: Phaidon Press Limited (2016). ↩︎
    2. Billhartz Gregorian, Cynthia. “An original vision with an attention to detail”. The Kansas City Star, October 18, 2015, p. 20G. ↩︎
    3. McCarter, Robert. Breuer. New York: Phaidon Press Limited (2016). ↩︎
    4. Paul, Steve. “Architecture A to Z”. The Kansas City Star Magazine, April 18, 2010, p. 15. ↩︎
    5. Billhartz Gregorian, Cynthia. “An original vision with an attention to detail”. The Kansas City Star, October 18, 2015, p. 20G. ↩︎
    6. ibid. ↩︎
    7. Burnett, W.C. “Architect Marcel Breuer’s influence memorialized in Atlanta Public Library”. The Atlanta Journal, July 8, 1981, p. 3-B. ↩︎

  • Urban Life: Delancey and Allen

    Corner of Delancy and Allen Streets, Lower East Side, New York
    Corner of Delancy and Allen Streets, Lower East Side, New York

  • Washington Union Station (1907) – Washington, D.C.

    D.H. Burnham & Company. Washington Union Station  (1907). Washington, D.C
    D.H. Burnham & Company. Washington Union Station (1907). Washington, D.C.1 2 3 4
    Looking at Washington Union Station from the southwest
    Looking at Washington Union Station from the southwest
    Statuary and inscripted frieze on the south facade of Washington Union Station, Washington, D.C.
    Statuary and inscripted frieze on the south facade of Washington Union Station, Washington, D.C.
    Original waiting room in Washington Union Station, Washington, D.C.
    Original waiting room in Washington Union Station, Washington, D.C.
    Loggia on the south facade of Washington Union Station, Washington, D.C.
    Loggia on the south facade of Washington Union Station, Washington, D.C.
    Second-floor window on the south facade of Washington Union Station, Washington, D.C.
    Second-floor window on the south facade of Washington Union Station, Washington, D.C.
    Eagle statuary and inscribed frieze on the south facade of Washington Union Station, Washington, D.C.
    Eagle statuary and inscribed frieze on the south facade of Washington Union Station, Washington, D.C.

    References

    1. “New Union Passenger Station For Washington.” The Washington Post, March 17, 1902, p. 1. ↩︎
    2. “The Proposed New Union Railway Depot.” The Washington Times, March 17, 1902, p. 3. ↩︎
    3. “Farewell To Old Terminal”. The Sunday Star (Washington, D.C.), November 17, 1907, Part 1, p. 3. ↩︎
    4. “New Union Station”. The Sunday Star (Washington, D.C.), November 24, 1907, Part 8, p. 11. ↩︎
  • Urban Life: Painted turtles

    Painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) at Prospect Park, Brooklyn, New York

    I spent six hours yesterday lying on a bench in Atlanta’s Piedmont Park, overlooking Lake Clara Meer. The water was full of honking geese, but I was disappointed by the lack of turtles.

    I thought about my visit to Prospect Park last July, when I spotted this log full of painted turtles catching flies.

    New York, how I miss you.

  • Urban Life: LES

    Corner of Essex and Broome Streets. Lower East Side, New York
    Corner of Essex and Broome Streets. Lower East Side, New York
  • Metropolitan Club (1894) – New York

    Stanford White of McKim, Mead & White. Metropolitan Club (1894). New York.
    Stanford White of McKim, Mead & White. Metropolitan Club (1894). New York.1

    The Fifth Avenue side of the Metropolitan Club enjoys just a few minutes of direct light in the winter, so I had to work fast for this picture.

    It was a freezing day in January—hours before a snowstorm hit—but damn it, the result was worth the misery.

    Location of the Metropolitan Club

    Of the many fine examples of Stanford White‘s work in New York, the Metropolitan Club is the best.

    The building’s composition is simple yet refined; the elements are perfectly balanced, and the facade is delicately textured with just the right amount of ornamentation.

    Someday I’ll get the detail shots.

    The structure was designed in the style of an Italian palazzo and built of marble, with opulent interiors that I’ll certainly never photograph. The club, after all, was founded by millionaires and is now patronized by billionaires.

    I’ll just take pics by the Halal cart across the street, thanks.

    Gallery

    Interior2

    Main Hall of the Metropolitan Club, New York
    Main Hall of the Metropolitan Club, New York

    Elevations, Sections, and Floorplans3

    Sixtieth Street Elevation of the Metropolitan Club, New York
    Sixtieth Street Elevation of the Metropolitan Club, New York
    Section and detail drawings of the Metropolitan Club, New York
    Section and detail drawings of the Metropolitan Club, New York
    First floor plan of the Metropolitan Club, New York
    First floor plan of the Metropolitan Club, New York
    Second floor plan of the Metropolitan Club, New York

    References

    1. “New Club Of The Millionaires.” The World (New York), February 25, 1894, p. 26. ↩︎
    2. A Monograph of the Work of McKim Mead & White, 1879-1915. New York: The Architectural Book Publishing Company, 1915. ↩︎
    3. ibid. ↩︎