Category: Architectural Movements and Styles

  • Bunger-Henry Building (1964) – Atlanta

    Finch, Alexander, Barnes, Rothschild & Paschal (FABRAP). Bunger-Henry Chemical Engineering and Ceramics Engineering Building (1964), Georgia Institute of Technology. Atlanta.
    Finch, Alexander, Barnes, Rothschild & Paschal (FABRAP). Bunger-Henry Chemical Engineering and Ceramics Engineering Building (1964), Georgia Institute of Technology. Atlanta.1 2
    Windows on the Bunger-Henry Building
    Windows on the Bunger-Henry Building, Atlanta
    Sun screens on the Bunger-Henry Building
    Sun screens on the Bunger-Henry Building, Atlanta
    Looking at the Bunger-Henry Building from the southeast
    Looking at the Bunger-Henry Building from the southeast

    References

    1. Georgia Institute of Technology Campus Historic Preservation Plan Update, 2023 ↩︎
    2. Craig, Robert M. Georgia Tech: Campus Architecture. Charleston, South Carolina: Arcadia Publishing (2021). ↩︎
  • Jefferson-Pilot Building (1990) – Greensboro, North Carolina

    Smallwood, Reynolds, Stewart & Stewart. Jefferson-Pilot Building (1990). Greensboro, North Carolina.
    Smallwood, Reynolds, Stewart & Stewart. Jefferson-Pilot Building (1990). Greensboro, North Carolina.1 2 3
    Windows and spandrels on the Jefferson-Pilot Building, Greensboro, North Carolina
    Windows and spandrels on the Jefferson-Pilot Building, Greensboro, North Carolina
    Upper floors of the Jefferson-Pilot Building, Greensboro, North Carolina
    Upper floors of the Jefferson-Pilot Building, Greensboro, North Carolina

    References

    1. Schlosser, Jim. “Building designers to draw from past”. Greensboro News & Record (Greensboro, North Carolina), February 26, 1988, p. A12. ↩︎
    2. Schlosser, Jim. “Jefferson-Pilot building provides another trade-off”. Greensboro News & Record (Greensboro, North Carolina), July 3, 1988, p. D1. ↩︎
    3. Hopper, Kathryn. “New Jefferson-Pilot building officially a part of downtown”. Greensboro News & Record (Greensboro, North Carolina), July 22, 1990, p. D1. ↩︎
  • Kiser Law Building (1891-1936) – Atlanta

    Bruce & Morgan. Kiser Law Building (1891-1936). Atlanta.
    Bruce & Morgan. Kiser Law Building (1891-1936). Atlanta.1

    The Background

    The following article, published in The Atlanta Constitution in 1890, includes an illustration and a brief description of the Kiser Law Building, completed in 1891 and designed by Bruce & Morgan.

    Location of Kiser Law Building

    Located at the northwest corner of Hunter and Pryor Streets (later Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive SE and Pryor Street SE) in Atlanta, the five-story office building was owned by M.C. Kiser (1830-18932), a local real estate developer.

    For several years, members of the Atlanta Bar Association had reportedly approached Kiser (pictured here3) with requests that he build a structure designed exclusively for law offices.4 5

    When Kiser finally agreed to the project, the association formed a building committee that considered two designs for the structure: one by A.Mc.C. Nixon, and the winning plan by Bruce & Morgan.6 7

    Bruce’s Approach

    Although T.H. Morgan increasingly became the primary designer for Bruce & Morgan through the 1890s, A.C. Bruce still handled the majority of the firm’s output in the early part of the decade, and the Kiser Law Building appears to have been his design.

    Bruce was a former cabinetmaker and carpenter who lacked formal architectural training, and by 1890, the limits of his skill set were becoming readily apparent.

    Many of Bruce’s designs from the early 1890s appear heavy-handed and anachronistic: you can see he was attempting to adapt to modern tastes, but his design sensibility was still fundamentally stuck in the 1870s—the Kiser Law Building was a prime example.

    Looking at the illustration above, the building resembles a stack of drawers haphazardly piled on top of each other, and oversized windows of varying shapes and sizes clutter both facades.

    That additive approach to design was typical of architects with a background in carpentry, who often designed buildings as if they were giant pieces of furniture, joining disparate elements and tacking on unnecessary embellishments rather than envisioning their compositions as solid masses to be sculpted into form.

    The building’s overall style is equally baffling: Bruce was presumably aiming for the Romanesque, but for all the eclectic adornments, including terra cotta trim,8 9a decorative slate roof with iron crestings, ornamental iron balconies, and marble columns,10 he didn’t quite achieve a cohesive style. The pyramidal peaks and elaborate gables were also becoming rapidly outdated by 1891.

    Kiser Law Building circa 1895
    Kiser Law Building circa 189511

    Design and Construction

    As construction began, a report said the Kiser Law Building would be constructed of either Berea sandstone or marble.12 It’s Atlanta, so it appears they opted for the cheaper sandstone for most of the structure and incorporated marble trim around the entrance.13

    Set over a full basement, the building’s five floors included a 16-foot-wide central hall, served by one elevator, four stairwells, and two fire escapes. A light court also extended from the top to the bottom floor, so that each of the building’s 84 offices would be lighted and ventilated from the outside.14

    The building was illuminated with electric lighting and included “water closets of the latest patterns…located in the rear [heh] of every floor.15

    While it was originally reported that the building would be heated by steam,16 17 Kiser ultimately chose the Bolton Hot Water System, which was marketed as a “purely scientific, healthful way of heating.”18

    I don’t really care enough about such things to learn more; however, the man who supervised the heating system’s installation told the Constitution: “…the larger buildings in the north have been heated by hot water apparatuses for the last ten or twelve years, yet it is practically new for the south…”19

    No surprise, really: Atlanta’s self-conscious developers are always late to the game, simply replicating what was done a decade ago in the better cities of the North.

    The floors of the Kiser Law Building were planned as follows:

    • The ground floor included spaces for four stores—the storefront at the corner of Hunter and Pryor was designated for a bank,20 and another space facing Pryor Street was planned as a restaurant.21 The entrance hallway featured marble wainscoting and tile22 and led to “four broad stairways” and “an elevator of the most approved pattern.”23
    • The second, third, and fourth floors were identical in design, and each contained 28 office suites—14 on each side of the central hall. The offices were finished in hardwoods and Georgia pine, with fireproof vaults and closets.24 25
    • The fifth floor was intended to house two large halls “suited to the use of secret societies, public meetings and other similar purposes,”26 as well as a kitchen, storerooms, reception room, and a club room or library.27

    Construction on the building began on April 8, 1890,28 with J.H. Matthews,29 “a wide-awake contractor”,30 supervising the project. The initial estimated cost of the building was $90,000, with a projected completion date of April 1, 1891.31 The cost rose to $100,000 by 1891,32 and the building was completed in August 1891.33 34

    Local interest in the project was high, and while construction was still underway in November 1890, Kiser had reportedly received applications from 100 lawyers seeking office space.35

    Firms began announcing their intention to move to the building in early 1891,36 and in June 1891, George W. Adair, who handled leasing for the property, reported: “The Kiser law building is nearly ready for occupancy, which is good news to those who have already selected their rooms, and others that are waiting for its completion.”37

    Their lease agreements should have included the following caveat: the only thing slimier than a lawyer is an Atlanta developer.

    The Terminal Debacle

    In July 1891, Kiser leased nearly the entire law building—including the top four floors, the corner store on the ground floor, and the full basement38 39 —to a single firm: the Richmond Terminal Company, which had abruptly decided to relocate its headquarters from Washington, D.C. to Atlanta.40

    The company said it intended to use the Kiser Building as temporary office space until it could build its own facility in the city,41 signing a two-year lease for the then-unheard-of sum (in Atlanta anyway) of $14,500 a year.42 43

    Commonly referred to as the “Terminal”, the company had previously purchased the Central Railroad and Banking Company, Georgia’s oldest railroad,44 based in Savannah. The Terminal’s new Atlanta headquarters consolidated the employees from both Savannah and Washington in a single location.

    However, the Kiser Building was much too small to house the Terminal’s 250 to 300 workers,45 46 and one executive stated, “Unfortunately that building is not large enough to fully accommodate all the offices, but we will try to make do.” Kiser said of the negotiation: “…the trouble was they wanted more room, but finally concluded they could get along by adding the corner room and the basement.”47

    The Terminal’s hasty relocation to Atlanta was more than a little suspicious, and allegations that it wasn’t “bona fide” circulated, though the company denied it.48 Atlanta’s newspapers, of course, hailed the move, with the always-bloviating Constitution prognosticating:

    “A grand new depot and office building. That is the inevitable result.

    The bringing of these offices to Atlanta is a bigger thing than might appear at first glance. This naturally makes Atlanta the center of the railroad situation of the south, and, as Atlanta is now the insurance center, it becomes beyond question the financial center of the south.”49

    The lawyers who already selected offices in the Kiser Building just had to suck it, I guess. The Odd Fellows probably weren’t too thrilled either: the Constitution reported in July 1891 that “about ten days ago they selected the fifth floor of the Kiser building and immediately rented it as an Odd Fellows’ hall. Then the Terminal people came along and wished the place.”50

    Anyone who knows how shit goes down in Atlanta could guess what happened next: Just six months after the Terminal employees began working in the Kiser building, the Central Railroad was forced into receivership by a local judge.51 52

    Rumors of the Terminal’s financial difficulties and potential bankruptcy had swirled around Atlanta for months, spurred by the resignations of top executives and directors who had reportedly been battling for control of the company.53 54

    There was also the time in January 1892, when the company apparently lacked the funds to pay its employees, delaying their paychecks for more than a week,55 56 57 58 a situation charitably described as “embarrassing.”59

    The final blow was delivered in a lawsuit filed by a stockholder against the company, alleging that, among other things, the Terminal’s owners were conspiring to transfer $500,000,000 in debt onto the Central Railroad, “which it [could] never pay,”60 61 presumably with the intent to bankrupt it. Sounds like business as usual for an American enterprise.

    Under the rules of the receivership, the Central Railroad’s 74 employees62 returned to Savannah,63 64 and while it initially appeared that the remaining Terminal employees would stay in Atlanta, they were ordered back to Washington in June 1892, leaving the Kiser Building nearly vacant.65 66The company hired George W. Adair to sublet the building,67 which was filled with lawyers as originally planned.68

    Kiser Law Building circa 1936
    Kiser Law Building circa 1936

    The Inevitable Demise

    Office structures tend to fall out of fashion quickly, and in 1930, the Journal said of the Kiser Law Building: “…the lawyers, loan brokers, and trade representatives [have] shifted to more modernly equipped buildings…”, noting that, “storms of nearly half a century have raised havoc with the structure and its artistic domes, its oriel windows, and its ornamental trimmings.”69

    By 1936, the Kiser Law Building was reportedly “almost empty except for a store or two on the sidewalk.”70 No one seemed too upset when the structure was demolished in November and December 1936 for—take a wild guess—a parking lot.71 72 73


    The Article

    Bruce & Morgan. Kiser Law Building (1891-1936). Atlanta.
    Bruce & Morgan. Kiser Law Building (1891-1936). Atlanta.

    Major M.C. Kiser’s “Law Building” will be one of the handsomest buildings in the south, and when finished will be one of Atlanta’s greatest attractions.

    The Constitution gives here an excellent cut of the building, made from the drawings of Bruce & Morgan, the architects. The uses to which the building are to be put have been fully explained in these columns.

    The building will be erected at the corner of Pryor and Hunter streets, fronting on Pryor, and will be five stories in height. It will be devoted to offices for lawyers, with clubrooms for a Lawyers’ club. It will be just as complete as possible, an ideal building in every respect.74

    References

    1. Illustration credit: Atlanta in 1890: “The Gate City”. Atlanta: The Atlanta Historical Society, Inc. (1986), p. 62. ↩︎
    2. “M.C. Kiser Dead”. The Atlanta Constitution, December 1, 1893, p. 5. ↩︎
    3. Illustration credit: “The Programme For Today Is Here.” The Atlanta Constitution, August 14, 1890, p. 5. ↩︎
    4. “The Kiser Building”. The Atlanta Constitution, January 26, 1890, p. 19. ↩︎
    5. “Kiser’s Law Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 8, 1890, p. 7. ↩︎
    6. “The Kiser Building”. The Atlanta Constitution, January 26, 1890, p. 19. ↩︎
    7. “Kiser’s Law Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 8, 1890, p. 7. ↩︎
    8. “The Kiser Building”. The Atlanta Constitution, January 26, 1890, p. 19. ↩︎
    9. “History In Clay.” The Atlanta Constitution, May 15, 1892, p. 3. ↩︎
    10. “Kiser’s Law Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 8, 1890, p. 7. ↩︎
    11. Photo credit: Art Work of Atlanta: Published in Twelve Parts ↩︎
    12. “Kiser’s Law Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 8, 1890, p. 7. ↩︎
    13. “The Kiser Building”. The Atlanta Constitution, January 26, 1890, p. 19. ↩︎
    14. “Kiser’s Law Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 8, 1890, p. 7. ↩︎
    15. Ibid. ↩︎
    16. “The Kiser Building”. The Atlanta Constitution, January 26, 1890, p. 19. ↩︎
    17. “Kiser’s Law Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 8, 1890, p. 7. ↩︎
    18. “Kiser Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, September 6, 1891, p. 3. ↩︎
    19. Ibid. ↩︎
    20. “Kiser’s Law Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 8, 1890, p. 7. ↩︎
    21. “The Kiser Building”. The Atlanta Journal, November 29, 1890, p. 5. ↩︎
    22. “The Kiser Building”. The Atlanta Constitution, January 26, 1890, p. 19. ↩︎
    23. “Kiser’s Law Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 8, 1890, p. 7. ↩︎
    24. “The Kiser Building”. The Atlanta Constitution, January 26, 1890, p. 19. ↩︎
    25. “Kiser’s Law Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 8, 1890, p. 7. ↩︎
    26. Ibid. ↩︎
    27. “The Kiser Building”. The Atlanta Constitution, January 26, 1890, p. 19. ↩︎
    28. “Kiser’s Law Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 8, 1890, p. 7. ↩︎
    29. “Atlanta Building Up.” The Atlanta Constitution, October 3, 1890, p. 3. ↩︎
    30. “A Hoisting Elevator.” The Atlanta Journal, November 11, 1890, p. 1. ↩︎
    31. “Kiser’s Law Building.” The Atlanta Constitution, April 8, 1890, p. 7. ↩︎
    32. “Etched and Sketched.” The Atlanta Constitution, July 30, 1891, p. 4. ↩︎
    33. “Railroad Notes.” The Atlanta Constitution, August 16, 1891, p. 19. ↩︎
    34. “They Are Here.” The Atlanta Constitution, August 24, 1891, p. 4. ↩︎
    35. “The Kiser Building”. The Atlanta Journal, November 29, 1890, p. 5. ↩︎
    36. “Land Titles.” The Atlanta Journal, April 30, 1891, p. 7. ↩︎
    37. “FOR RENT — Houses, Cottages, Etc.” The Atlanta Constitution, June 28, 1891, p. 10. ↩︎
    38. “The Kiser Building”. The Atlanta Constitution, July 23, 1891, p. 4. ↩︎
    39. “Terminal Offices In The Kiser Block.” The Atlanta Constitution, July 24, 1891, p. 2. ↩︎
    40. “The General Offices”. The Atlanta Constitution, July 22, 1891, p. 7. ↩︎
    41. Ibid. ↩︎
    42. “Terminal Offices In The Kiser Block.” The Atlanta Constitution, July 24, 1891, p. 2. ↩︎
    43. “Then And Now.” The Atlanta Constitution, July 28, 1891, p. 5. ↩︎
    44. “The Central’s Fate.” The Atlanta Constitution, March 5, 1892, p. 1. ↩︎
    45. “To Move Their Offices.” The Atlanta Journal, June 17, 1892, p. 3. ↩︎
    46. “Fleming Out.” The Atlanta Constitution, July 25, 1892, p. 3. ↩︎
    47. “Terminal Offices In The Kiser Block.” The Atlanta Constitution, July 24, 1891, p. 2. ↩︎
    48. Ibid. ↩︎
    49. Ibid. ↩︎
    50. “Might Have Interrupted Their Plans.” The Atlanta Constitution, July 26, 1891, p. 15. ↩︎
    51. “A Receiver!” The Atlanta Journal, March 4, 1892, p. 1. ↩︎
    52. “The Central’s Fate.” The Atlanta Constitution, March 5, 1892, p. 1. ↩︎
    53. “Changes In The Terminal.” The Macon Telegraph (Macon, Georgia), January 5, 1892, p. 1. ↩︎
    54. “The Complete Story”. The Atlanta Constitution, January 6, 1892, p. 1. ↩︎
    55. “Railroad News.” The Atlanta Constitution, January 1, 1892, p. 3. ↩︎
    56. “Pay Day Postponed.” The Atlanta Journal, January 1, 1892, p. 3. ↩︎
    57. “They Have Resigned”. The Atlanta Journal, January 5, 1892, p. 3. ↩︎
    58. “Salaries Paid.” The Macon Telegraph (Macon, Georgia), January 7, 1892, p. 2. ↩︎
    59. “Atlanta’s Rumors.” The Morning News (Savannah, Georgia), January 7, 1892, p. 1. ↩︎
    60. “A Receiver!” The Atlanta Journal, March 4, 1892, p. 1. ↩︎
    61. “The Central’s Fate.” The Atlanta Constitution, March 5, 1892, p. 1. ↩︎
    62. “Fleming Out.” The Atlanta Constitution, June 25, 1892, p. 3. ↩︎
    63. “Paints A Rosy Picture.” The Atlanta Journal, March 29, 1892, p. 1. ↩︎
    64. “The Central’s Officials”. The Atlanta Journal, March 30, 1892, p. 1. ↩︎
    65. “To Move Their Offices”. The Atlanta Journal, June 17, 1892, p. 3. ↩︎
    66. “Are Anxious To Leave.” The Atlanta Journal, June 18, 1892, p. 3. ↩︎
    67. “Mr. W.G. Oakman”. The Atlanta Journal, June 22, 1892, p. 1. ↩︎
    68. “Kiser Building, Familiar Landmark Here For Almost 50 Years, Will Be Demolished”. The Atlanta Journal, November 15, 1936, p. 8-D. ↩︎
    69. Moody, George O. “‘Home’ In Kiser Building Lost By Pigeons”. The Atlanta Journal, July 6, 1930, p. 2. ↩︎
    70. “Old Landmark Of City Will Be Demolished”. The Atlanta Constitution, November 15, 1936, p. 6C. ↩︎
    71. Ibid. ↩︎
    72. “Kiser Building, Familiar Landmark Here For Almost 50 Years, Will Be Demolished”. The Atlanta Journal, November 15, 1936, p. 8-D. ↩︎
    73. “Adair Announces Important Leases”. The Atlanta Journal, December 6, 1936, p. 6-D. ↩︎
    74. The Atlanta Constitution, March 30, 1890, p. 8. ↩︎

  • C. Howard Candler Residence, “Callanwolde” (1921) – Atlanta

    Henry Hornbostel. C. Howard Candler Residence, "Callanwolde" (1921). Druid Hills, Atlanta.    
    Henry Hornbostel. C. Howard Candler Residence, “Callanwolde” (1921). Druid Hills, Atlanta.1 2 3 4 5
    Gable and chimney on the facade of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    Gable and chimney on the facade of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    Second-floor windows and half-timbering on the facade of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    Second-floor windows and half-timbering on the facade of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    Chimney and barge-board on the facade of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    Chimney and barge-board on the facade of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    Front entrance of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    Front entrance of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    Half-timbering and strapwork ornament on the facade of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    Half-timbering and strapwork ornament on the facade of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    Second-floor windows and balcony on the facade of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    Second-floor windows and balcony on the facade of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    Southwest elevation of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    Southwest elevation of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    Looking at Callanwolde from the west
    Looking at Callanwolde from the west
    Triple window on the northwest elevation of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    Triple window on the northwest elevation of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    Gable and oriel window on the northwest elevation of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    Gable and oriel window on the northwest elevation of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    First-floor windows and patio on the southwest elevation of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    First-floor windows and patio on the southwest elevation of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    Strapwork ornament on the southwest elevation of Callanwolde, Atlanta
    Strapwork ornament on the southwest elevation of Callanwolde, Atlanta

    References

    1. National Register of Historic Places Inventory – Nomination Form: Callanwolde ↩︎
    2. “Joseph Habersham Chapter to Meet”. The Atlanta Journal, December 7, 1919, p. G5. ↩︎
    3. “Folks, Facts and Fables”. The Atlanta Journal, April 13, 1921, p. 11. ↩︎
    4. “Druid Hills Lot” (advertisement). The Atlanta Journal, May 25, 1921, p. 23. ↩︎
    5. Faith, Boyce. “A House Of Pink Marble”. The Atlanta Journal Magazine, July 2, 1922, p. 10. ↩︎
  • Cable Building (1893) – New York

    Stanford White of McKim, Mead & White. The Cable Building (1893). Greenwich Village, New York.
    Stanford White of McKim, Mead & White. The Cable Building (1893). Greenwich Village, New York.

    The Cable Building is one of my favorite New York structures, mostly because I have fond memories associated with it, including the quiet Thanksgiving morning when I took the picture shown above.

    Completed around late 1893, this eight-story steel-framed building1 includes a full basement and fronts on Broadway, Houston, and Mercer Streets on the border of Greenwich Village and NoHo.

    Location of the Cable Building

    The Cable Building was designed for the Broadway & Seventh Avenue Railway Company by Stanford White of McKim, Mead & White,2 and is a very early example of the Beaux-Arts style.

    The building’s exterior was originally faced with Indiana limestone on the first and second floors, and the upper floors are covered in yellow brick and striking ornamental terracotta,3 topped by an elaborate copper cornice.

    Southeast corner of the Cable Building, New York
    Southeast corner of the Cable Building, New York

    Each floor encompasses nearly 20,000 square feet4 and encircles a central light court of more than 3,000 square feet.5 6 At its opening, the building’s first floor was designated for retail use, with the top three floors designed for offices and the middle floors reserved for warehouse space.7

    My favorite part of the exterior is the classically inspired sculpture of two robed women guarding the portico on the east facade, designed by J. Massey Rhind.8

    J. Massey Rhind. Sculpture on the east facade of the Cable Building, New York.
    J. Massey Rhind. Sculpture on the east facade of the Cable Building, New York.

    That said, the building’s overall design isn’t White’s best: the chamfered corners temper the appearance of bulkiness and provide interesting focal points, but the many large windows on every side clutter the composition, making it look messy and overwrought.

    What makes the Cable Building impressive, however, is that it was designed to conceal a power plant for the street railway company, effectively creating “a building within a building”.9

    Reaching 46 feet below the street surface,10 the building’s basement originally housed 550 tons of machinery that powered the company’s cable cars, including wheels measuring 32 feet in diameter and weighing 50 tons each.11

    Cornice on the Cable Building, New York
    Cornice on the Cable Building, New York

    The machinery has long since been removed, and today the Cable Building’s deep bowels house the Angelika Film Center, where there’s a chance you may find me some late evening, watching an indie flick as nearby subway trains rumble past.

    Gallery

    Cornice and terracotta ornamentation on the Cable Building, New York
    Cornice and terracotta ornamentation on the Cable Building, New York
    Chamfered corner bay on the facade of the Cable Building, New York
    Chamfered corner bay on the facade of the Cable Building, New York
    Fifth and sixth-floor windows on the Cable Building, New York
    Fifth and sixth-floor windows on the Cable Building, New York
    Terra cotta keystone and stringcourse on the Cable Building, New York
    Terra cotta keystone and stringcourse on the Cable Building, New York
    Stringcourse, pilaster, and terracotta ornamentation on the Cable Building, New York
    Stringcourse, pilaster, and terracotta ornamentation on the Cable Building, New York
    Arched window on the sixth floor of the Cable Building, New York
    Arched window on the sixth floor of the Cable Building, New York
    Double windows on the third floor of the Cable Building, New York
    Double windows on the third floor of the Cable Building, New York

    References

    1. “The Cable Building.” The New York Times, December 19, 1893, p. 9. ↩︎
    2. Baker, Paul R. Stanny: The Gilded Life of Stanford White. New York: The Free Press (1989), pp. 213-14. ↩︎
    3. “The Cable Building.” The New York Times, December 19, 1893, p. 9. ↩︎
    4. Ibid. ↩︎
    5. Ibid. ↩︎
    6. “A Model Building.” The Independent (New York), February 1, 1894, p. 22. ↩︎
    7. “The Cable Building.” The New York Times, December 19, 1893, p. 9. ↩︎
    8. Looking Up: The Cable Building – Village Preservation ↩︎
    9. “Motive Force Of The Cable Cars.” The Sun (New York), November 30, 1893, p. 7. ↩︎
    10. “The Cable Building.” The New York Times, December 19, 1893, p. 9. ↩︎
    11. “Motive Force Of The Cable Cars.” The Sun (New York), November 30, 1893, p. 7. ↩︎
  • Relic Signs: Mangel’s (1946) – Atlanta

    Mangel's (1946). 74 Peachtree Street, Atlanta.
    Mangel’s (1946). 74 Peachtree Street, Atlanta.

    This sign at 74 Peachtree Street in Atlanta (previously 74 Whitehall Street) likely debuted with the Mangel’s store, which opened in May 19461 in a portion of the two surviving floors from the former Hirsch Building.2

    Location of Mangel’s

    Mangel’s was a New York-based retail chain3 that billed itself as “your headquarters for smart apparel at budget-saving prices,”4 and the Whitehall store was its second Atlanta location, with its first store in the city opening in 1919.5

    Mangel’s operated at this location for decades, but seems to have quietly closed sometime after 1988.6

    References

    1. Advertisement. The Atlanta Journal, May 24, 1946, p. 10. ↩︎
    2. “Realty Trades”. The Atlanta Constitution, August 24, 1935, p. 4. ↩︎
    3. “Anniversary Sale At Mangel Store First Of Its Kind”. The Atlanta Journal, May 3, 1929, p. 31. ↩︎
    4. Advertisement. The Atlanta Journal, May 24, 1946, p. 10. ↩︎
    5. “Anniversary Sale At Mangel Store First Of Its Kind”. The Atlanta Journal, May 3, 1929, p. 31. ↩︎
    6. “Retail Management” (advertisement). The Atlanta Journal and Constitution, October 2, 1988, p. 80-P. ↩︎
  • Miles Brewton Residence (1769) – Charleston, South Carolina

    Ezra Waite (attributed). Miles Brewton Residence (1769). Charleston, South Carolina.
    Ezra Waite (attributed). Miles Brewton Residence (1769). Charleston, South Carolina.1 2

    References

    1. National Register of Historic Places Inventory — Nomination Form: The Miles Brewton House ↩︎
    2. Ravenel, Beatrice St. Julien. Architects of Charleston. Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press (1992), pp. 49-51. ↩︎
  • Second Presbyterian Church (1910) – Greenville, South Carolina

    Charles Edward Choate. Second Presbyterian Church (1910). Greenville, South Carolina.
    Charles Edward Choate. Second Presbyterian Church (1910). Greenville, South Carolina.1 2 3
    Steeple on Second Presbyterian Church, Greenville, South Carolina
    Steeple on Second Presbyterian Church, Greenville, South Carolina
    Looking at Second Presbyterian Church from the southeast
    Looking at Second Presbyterian Church from the southeast
    Window on the east facade of Second Presbyterian Church, Greenville, South Carolina
    Window on the east facade of Second Presbyterian Church, Greenville, South Carolina
    Terracotta dripstone over the east entrance of Second Presbyterian Church, Greenville, South Carolina
    Terracotta dripstone over the east entrance of Second Presbyterian Church, Greenville, South Carolina
    South facade of Second Presbyterian Church, Greenville, South Carolina
    South facade of Second Presbyterian Church, Greenville, South Carolina
    Blind arch and terracotta ornamentation on the east facade of Second Presbyterian Church, Greenville, South Carolina
    Blind arch and terracotta ornamentation on the east facade of Second Presbyterian Church, Greenville, South Carolina
    Pinnacle on Second Presbyterian Church, Greenville, South Carolina
    Pinnacle on Second Presbyterian Church, Greenville, South Carolina

    References

    1. “$90,000 To Be Spent In Church Building”. The Atlanta Journal, May 17, 1910, p. 6. ↩︎
    2. “Churches.” The Greenville Daily News (Greenville, South Carolina), June 12, 1910, p. 6. ↩︎
    3. “Initiatory Services”. The Greenville Daily News (Greenville, South Carolina), June 16, 1910, p. 8. ↩︎
  • NCAA Hall of Champions and NCAA Headquarters (2000) – Indianapolis, Indiana

    Michael Graves with Schimdt Associates. NCAA Hall of Champions (2000). Indianapolis, Indiana.
    Michael Graves with Schimdt Associates. NCAA Hall of Champions (2000). Indianapolis, Indiana.1 2
    South elevation of NCAA Headquarters
    South elevation of NCAA Headquarters
    Southwest corner of NCAA Headquarters
    Southwest corner of NCAA Headquarters
    East elevation of NCAA Headquarters
    East elevation of NCAA Headquarters

    References

    1. NCAA Headquarters and Hall of Champions – Michael Graves ↩︎
    2. NCAA Hall of Champions – Indiana Architecture Database ↩︎